-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Tuesday 28 January 2014 at 11:37:25 PM, in
<mid:20140128233725.6b12b3d0@steves-laptop>, Steve Jones wrote:


> A more sophisticated approach
> would be for OpenPGP to include a new signature type
> for this purpose.

There are already more than enough signature types. Wouldn't this lend
itself quite well to using a signature notation?



- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net

The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlLpmzZXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pOPoD/jfjg+2GAHzjy9XPrU7b5LR+HZuCNpP2nzcC
EImp/7oEuWTEV1l/9nuUcK9mXzt0JSOsDvALilC9HEvhW82y3vj0kPWh3oz0BCo1
uo2W+n5Q8GDRsIBDXYKkHyBIwJKac2Z++QURPcADdYtf+IJchEJP2KUcbbk5UOtq
nw75NoVs
=nY4e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to