-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 at 11:37:25 PM, in <mid:20140128233725.6b12b3d0@steves-laptop>, Steve Jones wrote: > A more sophisticated approach > would be for OpenPGP to include a new signature type > for this purpose. There are already more than enough signature types. Wouldn't this lend itself quite well to using a signature notation? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlLpmzZXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pOPoD/jfjg+2GAHzjy9XPrU7b5LR+HZuCNpP2nzcC EImp/7oEuWTEV1l/9nuUcK9mXzt0JSOsDvALilC9HEvhW82y3vj0kPWh3oz0BCo1 uo2W+n5Q8GDRsIBDXYKkHyBIwJKac2Z++QURPcADdYtf+IJchEJP2KUcbbk5UOtq nw75NoVs =nY4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
