On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Josef Carnap wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a question to the options --compress-level and
> --bzip2-compress-level. Which are the supportet (possible)
> values of each of the options? -- Numbers from 0 up to 6?
1 through 9, with
On 24/02/16 15:11, Josef Carnap wrote:
> I have a question to the options --compress-level and
> --bzip2-compress-level. Which are the supportet (possible)
> values of each of the options? -- Numbers from 0 up to 6?
The canonical way to use the BZIP2 algorithm on Linux is through
Hello everyone,
I have a question to the options --compress-level and
--bzip2-compress-level. Which are the supportet (possible)
values of each of the options? -- Numbers from 0 up to 6?
---
Here is the description of the both options in the GPG Manual:
-z n
--compress-level n
--bzip2-compress
NIIBE Yutaka:
> It seems for me that you don't have libbz2-dev package installed.
>
>$ sudo apt-get install libbz2-dev
right
/etc/apt/sources.list.bk
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnup
On 01/11/2016 05:52 PM, Fulano Diego Perez wrote:
> This must be something simple I'm missing but on a debian stretch 64
> machine i cannot get gpg 2.1.10 compiled with bzip2 support which
> prevents me from reading bzip2 compressed files - they can decrypt but:
[...]
> ENABLE_BZ
Hi,
This must be something simple I'm missing but on a debian stretch 64
machine i cannot get gpg 2.1.10 compiled with bzip2 support which
prevents me from reading bzip2 compressed files - they can decrypt but:
gpg: uncompressing failed: Unknown compression algorithm
./configure --
On 26/08/11 3:37 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:22, la...@thehaverkamps.net said:
>
>> changing from 4096 to 8192 bit)
>
> DON'T.
I understand the reasons for this, but is there any reason for not
using an 8kb (or larger) master/certification key with more normal
subkeys (e.g. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Run "sudo apt-get install bzip2" and see if that helps. Have you
changed your kernel at all?
David Manouchehri
On 8/25/2011 11:22 AM, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote:
> gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
-B
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:22, la...@thehaverkamps.net said:
> I compiled both the stock 1.4.11 & the Ubuntu 1.4.10. Both ways I get
> gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
You build gpg without bzip2 support. Install the libbz2-dev before
configuring.
> changing fro
d by law.
gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
gpg: invalid default preferences
gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
gpg: invalid personal compress preferences
I have never seen this with any distro binary, just this source (as I'm
changin
nked against libbz2, please read
>> http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-986-1 and upgrade appropriately for your
>> platform.
>>
>> To tell if your installation of GnuPG is using libbz2, run "gpg2 --version"
>> (or "gpg --version"). If you see "BZIP2" on
for your
> platform.
>
> To tell if your installation of GnuPG is using libbz2, run "gpg2 --version"
> (or "gpg --version"). If you see "BZIP2" on the "Compression" line, then you
> are linked with libbz2.
>
> David
>
Hi list reade
Hi,
The Windows installer version of GnuPG 1.4 uses a statically linked bzip
library. Thus the bzip2 bug affects this version.
We have not done a gnupg 1.4 release for more than a year. I believe it
is best to first do a release candidate. There a couple of bug fixes
collected over the last
rsion" (or
"gpg --version"). If you see "BZIP2" on the "Compression" line, then you are
linked with libbz2.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Henrik O A Barkman ha scritto:
>
> What is the reason for the Windows build of 1.4.10 (both the pulled and
> fixed binaries) not supporting BZIP2?
>
>
[cut]
I can see the bzip2, windows vista SP2
C:\Users\noiano>gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10
Copyright (C) 2009 Free S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sean Rima wrote:
> Just removed 1.4.10, installed just the gpg section and restarted
> GPGshell under Vista and it works fine
Since Werner and the literature state that it is Ok to install both
side-by-side is it really necessary to uninstall the 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John W. Moore III escribió:
> Werner Koch wrote:
>
>> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe
>> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe.sig
>
>> and select only the GnuPG component.
>
> If anyone tries this suggest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, at 06:20:48 [GMT -0400] (which was 12:20 where I
live) John W. Moore wrote:
> Werner Koch wrote:
>> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe
>> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe.sig
>>
>> an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Werner Koch wrote:
> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe
> ftp://ftp.gpg4win.org/gpg4win/gpg4win-light-2.0.0.exe.sig
>
> and select only the GnuPG component.
If anyone tries this suggestion I would be interested to learn if i
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:21, bark...@gmail.com said:
> What is the reason for the Windows build of 1.4.10 (both the pulled and
> fixed binaries) not supporting BZIP2?
I was not aware that bzip was in gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9 . It is all a
matter of the build environment; i.e. if the the bzib2 l
rypt if they were sent using
> BZIP2.
There is another possibility, John... I have just updated my tutorial
for the new versions of MinGW, MSYS and GCC and, of course, for GnuPG
1.4.10a including bzip2 support... ;-)
As usual, comments, suggestions, clarifications, insults, and so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
What is the reason for the Windows build of 1.4.10 (both the pulled and
fixed binaries) not supporting BZIP2?
D:\Test>gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or la
I don't want or need all the 'extras' that come
> with it.
Thanks David. Rather than resetting the preferences on My Key and then
asking every correspondent to update the copy on their Keyring I suppose
I shall remain using 1.4.10svn5068 to avoid receiving messages that I
cannot decr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Is there any particular reason why BZIP2 is missing from the Windows
Binary Release of 1.4.10?
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Friday 04 Sep 2009, 15:18 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn5068: (MingW32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John W. Moore III wrote:
> I have a Correspondent who has built 1.4.8 from the tar.gz for use on
> Ubuntu.
First, I can't recreate this (on Gutsy Gibbon/x86_64). Probably because
I have libbz2-dev installed; see below.
Second, Ubuntu ships with 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I have a Correspondent who has built 1.4.8 from the tar.gz for use on
Ubuntu. For some reason the Build, even after passing all 27 tests
does not list BZIP2 as an available for of compression.:-\ Since
the PK is distributed with BZIP2 in
lusfert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote on 06.01.2006 16:34:
>> http://www.bzip.org/
>>
> Thanks, this helps.
> I installed bzip2-1.0.3.tar.gz and after this command "./configure"
> found bzlib.h without additional options. Now af
>
I use bash.
> $ ./configure > LOG.config 2> ERR.config
>
> Now you can study the results to decide what to do next...
> I can already tell you right now that you will be building
> the BZIP library. If you see the following magic line in
> the LOG.config file:
>
> &qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Clizbe wrote:
> Come on, Debianistas. I know there are Debian users out there who can answer
> all
> of this.
Taking this question self-contained:
# apt-get install libbz2-dev
Then gnupg's configure should find it just fine, without specifying
On Jan 07, 2006 at 00:10 +0300, lusfert wrote:
> checking whether to enable the BZIP2 compression algorithm... yes
> checking for bzlib.h... no
maybe you must install somthing as bzip-devel?
Vale!
--
Pawel I. Shajdo
___
Gnupg-users mailin
lusfert wrote:
> John Clizbe wrote on 05.01.2006 19:50:
> OK, I tried again. Here is configure log:
> http://lusfert.land.ru/files/configure_log
>
> It contains these lines:
> -
> checking whether to enable the BZIP2 compression algorithm... yes
> ch
John Clizbe wrote on 05.01.2006 19:50:
> lusfert wrote:
>>Thus BZIP2 algorithm isn't supported after compiling GnuPG 1.4.2 from
>>source code under Linux.
>>How can I enable BZIP2 support using last version of GPG under Linux?
>
>
> What was the output from co
see the following magic line in
the LOG.config file:
"checking whether to enable the BZIP2 compression algorithm... yes"
you will know you are okay. If you don't ... more on that in a
moment...
>$ make
Ditto with output going to other files...
$ make > LOG.make 2> ERR.make
$ l
ore*
'make install'.
> # make install
>
> After these steps command "gpg --version" displays the following:
>
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.2
> [...]
> Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB
> Thus BZIP2 algorithm isn't supported after compiling GnuPG 1.4.2 from
>
ault gnupg installation from Debian
package) output of "gpg --version" was:
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.1
[...]
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
Windows version (installed from official binaries) also supports BZIP2:
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.2
[...]
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
Thus B
35 matches
Mail list logo
