On 26/08/11 3:37 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:22, la...@thehaverkamps.net said: > >> changing from 4096 to 8192 bit) > > DON'T.
I understand the reasons for this, but is there any reason for not using an 8kb (or larger) master/certification key with more normal subkeys (e.g. a 2048-bit signing subkey and a 4096-bit encryption subkey)? Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
