-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jerry escribió:
...
> Scenario 1:
>
> He is the boss, therefore no harm is done.
>
> Scenario 2:
>
> He is not the boss; however, he is permitted to use company time on
> private projects. Again, no harm is done.
>
> Scenario 3:
>
> He is not th
There was *one* auto-reply message, and it has not reoccured. Whatever was
wrong is clearly resolved. Let's move on. There is nothing else to see here.
David
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
Am 20.03.2010 14:01, schrieb egg...@gmail.com:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:49:46AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:17:03 +
>> Brad Rogers articulated:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:44:38 -0400
>>> "Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
[...]
I hope you people realize that you just produced
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:49:46AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:17:03 +
> Brad Rogers articulated:
>
> >On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:44:38 -0400
> >"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> >
> >Hello Robert,
> >
> >> half-dozen of us calling this guy's workplace and getting him in
> >> trouble
On 3/20/2010 8:49 AM, Jerry wrote:
> Scenario 3:
>
> He is not the boss, nor is he allowed to waste company time on private
> projects. In this scenario, the company gains by outing an employee who
> is wasting company resources and time on private projects.
Scenario 4:
He is not the boss and is
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:17:03 +
Brad Rogers articulated:
>On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:44:38 -0400
>"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
>
>Hello Robert,
>
>> half-dozen of us calling this guy's workplace and getting him in
>> trouble just because he had a braino when he left on vacation.
>
>It'd serve him ri
On 3/20/2010 7:17 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> It'd serve him right. Unless his employer pays him to read the
> list.
There are a fair number of jobs that would. Let's not make
presumptions, and let's let the list moderators handle this.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:44:38 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
Hello Robert,
> half-dozen of us calling this guy's workplace and getting him in
> trouble just because he had a braino when he left on vacation.
It'd serve him right. Unless his employer pays him to read the list.
--
Regards _
On 3/19/2010 7:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
> It must be that time of year again; birds sing, flowers bloom and
> broken 'vacation' message auto responders flourish. In any case, I am
> calling the number he published. Maybe they can fix the 'vacation
> message' apparatus.
More often than not, these sorts
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:06:26 -0600
Richard Hamilton articulated:
>I am out of the office until 03/22/2010.
>
>I am out of the office until Monday March 21st. If this is a
>production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or
>email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will
I am out of the office until 03/22/2010.
I am out of the office until Monday March 21st. If this is a production
problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or email Bob Olson
at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and cell phone
access.
Note: This is an automated
11 matches
Mail list logo
