.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
If you have any insight about that,
please kindly share! Thanks.
Sincerely,
Lin
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ork. If you have any insight about that,
please kindly share! Thanks.
Sincerely,
Lin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
olerated for at least a little bit. So please let me tell you about a
libre software business I've had a positive experience with.
GPGtools integrates GnuPG with Apple Mail. It does not do so perfectly:
you'll still need to use other applications to do key management and
whatnot. Alth
Sebastian,
Am Mittwoch 16 Juli 2025 12:34:34 schrieb Sebastian Wagner via Gnupg-users:
> Their work only consisted of development, not the uploading of packages
> to PyPI.
the plan of Paul and me is to upload a current version of the GPGME Python
bindungs to PyPI again. We have added
Hi Eva
On 11/07/2025 13:57, Eva Bolten via Gnupg-users wrote:
Have a look at the gnupg-devel list, there have been several threads regarding
python bindings of gpg and pypy recently, e.g.:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2025-June/035961.html
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release.
Version 2.5.9 which will soon lead us to the new stable 2.6 series.
This release mostly fixes regression in the previous releases.
The main features in the 2.6 series are improvements for 64 bit Windows
and the
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi Sebastian,
> So the packages are no longer updated on pypi? The gpg library published
> there is seven years old and broken.
Have a look at the gnupg-devel list, there have been several threads regarding
python bindings of gpg and pypy recently, e.g.:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail
Dear gnupg community
what is the correct replacement for the gone gpgme library?
https://pypi.org/project/gpgme/
which has vanished somewhere between June 10th and June 18th
The library published as gpg (https://pypi.org/project/gpgme/) is not a
replacement as that itself depends on the
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Dear gnupg community
what is the correct replacement for the gone gpgme library?
https://pypi.org/project/gpgme/
which has vanished somewhere between June 10th and June 18th
The library published as gpg (https://pypi.org/project/gpgme/) is not a
replacement as that itself depends on the
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users writes:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 21:21, Marco Moock said:
>
>> I noticed that gpg support bash command completion, but gpgsm doesn't.
>> Was that ever available for gpgsm?
>
> No idea. Should be easy to implement by parsing "gpgsm --dum
f a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi Marco,
Marco Moock via Gnupg-users writes:
> I am running Debian with 2.4.8-1.
>
> I noticed that gpg support bash command completion, but gpgsm doesn't.
> Was that ever available for gpgsm?
The bash completions for 'gpg' are maintained by the bash-completion
ature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 51f9e32f62fa6745c5cb09c2412a
>>
>> The trustdb is probably corrupt. Try this:
>>
>> $ gpg --fix-trustdb
>> gpg: You may try to re-create the trustdb using the commands:
>> gpg: cd ~/.gnupg
>> gpg: gpg --export-ownertrust > otrust.tmp
>&
ation.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
> Werner
>
> --
> The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
> refuse military service. - A. Einstein
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ion: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
!
>
>>>> gpg: DBG: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey; fpr:
>>>> 51f9e32f62fa6745c5cb09c2412a
>
> The trustdb is probably corrupt. Try this:
>
> $ gpg --fix-trustdb
> gpg: You may try to re-create the trustdb using the commands:
> gpg: cd ~/.gnupg
This has been an ongoing problem after the yang merge
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:05 AM To Damon via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> gpg (GnuPG) 2.4.8 still has these issues.
>
>
> Hi Werner Koch, would you mind taking a look at this issue when you have a
> mome
ng warning:
gpg: WARNING: multiple signatures detected. Only the first will be checked.
Oops.
Digging through archaeological layers of the internet we find this:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2013-January/027284.html
Which summed up says concatenated signatures don't work unles
Hi!
>>> gpg: DBG: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey; fpr:
>>> 51f9e32f62fa6745c5cb09c2412a
The trustdb is probably corrupt. Try this:
$ gpg --fix-trustdb
gpg: You may try to re-create the trustdb using the commands:
gpg: cd ~/.gnupg
gpg: gpg --export-ownertrus
gpg (GnuPG) 2.4.8 still has these issues.
Hi Werner Koch, would you mind taking a look at this issue when you have a
moment?
> On 13 Jun 2025, at 22:34, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>
> On 13 Jun 2025, at 15:29, To Damon wrote:
>>
>>> gpg --list-secret-keys --with-finge
Lorum Ipsum wrote:
> I just installed GnuPG 2.5.8., and immediately ran into issues with with it.
>
> The first issue was encrypting data: when attempting to encrypt a message,
> I got the following error message:
>
> gpg: pubkey_encrypt failed: Invalid data
> gpg: b
no expect an immediate 2.5.9
release to fix this issue.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gn
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 21:46, Suhas Srivastava said:
> library. After examining that issue, the author suggested that the leftover
> lock files may be a gpg issue and not a library issue. The whole error
These lock files like
~/.gnupg/#lk0x558d3fe5e990.foo.24728
are created as p
I just installed GnuPG 2.5.8., and immediately ran into issues with with it.
The first issue was encrypting data: when attempting to encrypt a message,
I got the following error message:
gpg: pubkey_encrypt failed: Invalid data
gpg: build_packet(PLAINTEXT) failed: Invalid data
gpg
Thanks Werner for your response.
I am using the python-gnupg <https://github.com/vsajip/python-gnupg>
project to manage GPG related operations and I encountered an error where,
after key creation, certain lock files remain in the system.
Thinking that the lock files are left over
names
is coming from "GPG on host" vs. "GPG running inside the Flatpak
container".
- bbhtt
https://bbhtt.space
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
n have a /etc/gnupg/gpg-agent.conf file which is
read before the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf file? This might already help - I
don't know the details of flatpack, though.
What you can also do is to examine an environment variable and set the
rspecive options depending on the envvar. For example assumi
ss world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi Team,
I received a mail from GnuPG today stating that ebo (Eva) has created an
account for me with the username: suhas.srivastava
I even received a link to phabricator to set my password but opening that
link brings up a 403 forbidden page.
I request for a dev.gnupg.org account because I have
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
version 2.5.8. This release is another one in a series of public
testing releases eventually leading to a new stable version 2.6.
The main features in the 2.6 series are improvements for 64 bit Windows
and the
.tech
Please let me know if any further information is needed.
Thanks & Regards,
Suhas Srivastava
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 18 Jun 2025, at 17:15, Walt Mankowski wrote:
>
> Good idea! I renamed my .gnupg directory, killed dirmngr, and then tried to
> receive a key:
>
> % gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys
> 7FE79B445728C8EA0042839E45BCE75B840B1F69
> gpg: directory &
11371/tcp# OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver
>>
>> I tried commenting out the udp version and restarting dirmngr, but that had
>> no effect.
> No, I wouldn’t expect it to. /etc/services is mainly informational these
> days, most applications hard code their port numbers.
>
Good idea! I renamed my .gnupg directory, killed dirmngr, and then tried to
receive a key:
% gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys
7FE79B445728C8EA0042839E45BCE75B840B1F69
gpg: directory '/Users/waltman/.gnupg' created
It hung for several minutes and then I killed it
e GPGtools installed, which makes it difficult to replicate your environment
- but I made sure to kill dirmngr and allow the homebrew gpg to start its own,
and I haven’t seen any issues with keyserver connectivity.
Could you try renaming your .gnupg directory temporarily and checking if the
ost<->host case (nothing is changed there).
- bbhtt
https://bbhtt.space
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
No, I wouldn’t expect it to. /etc/services is mainly informational these days,
most applications hard code their port numbers.
A
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
OL for 2.4 will
be reached in one year.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailin
e udp version and restarting dirmngr, but that had no
effect.
Walt
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025, at 5:53 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 14 Jun 2025, at 21:36, Walt Mankowski via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>>
>> Every time I try to import a key, it fails almost immediately with the error
>&g
On 14 Jun 2025, at 21:36, Walt Mankowski via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> Every time I try to import a key, it fails almost immediately with the error
>
> gpg: keyserver receive failed: Try again later
>
> I've tried a number of different keyservers and keep getting the s
On 6/15/25 06:36, Walt Mankowski via Gnupg-users wrote:
[...]
I couldn't find any similar error reports on gnupg-users or
gnupg-devel. It does make searching a bit tough, though, when I keep
finding it referred to as "OSX" or "OS X" even though Apple changed
the nam
Hi C.J.,
Good to see you too.
I didn't run any tests since I installed the binary using homebrew. I suppose
trying to install from source will be my next step.
I couldn't find any similar error reports on gnupg-users or gnupg-devel. It
does make searching a bit tough, though, w
Hi,
I recently got a new MacBook Air and I'm having trouble setting up gpg on it.
I'm running macOS Sequoia 15.5 and the laptop has an Apple M4 chip.
I installed gpg 2.4.8 using homebrew and copied my .gnupg directory from my
older Intel-based MacBook Pro. It can use existing keys
gpg: key occurs more than once in the trustdb
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: Note: ultimately trusted key not found
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
/home/user/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
> gpg --export-options export-minimal --export 6B335000 | gpg
> --list-p
226b335000
> gpg: key occurs more than once in the trustdb
> gpg: checking the trustdb
> gpg: Note: ultimately trusted key not found
> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> /home/user/.gnupg/pubring.kbx
This looks like there is a second issue, which is
On 5 Jun 2025, at 10:24, To Damon via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
>> gpg --list-secret-keys --keyid-format=long --with-keygrip
> gpg: DBG: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey; fpr:
> e32f62fa6745c5cb09c2412a
At some point it appears to have converted a v4 fingerprint with
When a GPG key has a fingerprint or keyID that ends with a long sequence of
zero bytes (e.g., ), GnuPG fails to assign trust to the key and
reports an error when running `gpg --check-trustdb` or using the key in Git
signature verification.
This appears to be a bug in the
Hi,
I couldn't figure out how to get an account on `dev.gnupg.org`
so I'm posting this to the list.
Recently, we (the maintainers of the Flatpak runtime - Freedesktop SDK)
patched GnuPG to skip sending `DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS` from inside
the Flatpak sandbox (inside the sandbox G
Hi,
I couldn't figure out how to get an account on `dev.gnupg.org`
so I'm posting this to the list.
Recently, we (the maintainers of the Flatpak runtime - Freedesktop SDK)
patched GnuPG to skip sending `DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS` from inside
the Flatpak sandbox (inside the sandbox G
That is likley a systemd thing. Snippet from the latest README:
If your systems already comes with a systemd enabled GnuPG, you
should thus tell it not to start its own GnuPG daemons by running
the following three commands once:
systemctl --user mask --now gpg-agent.service \
Am 07.06.2025 um 18:17:53 Uhr schrieb Daniel Brandes via Gnupg-users:
> Am 28.05.25 um 09:38 schrieb Daniel Brandes:
> > Am 28.05.25 um 07:38 schrieb Christoph Klassen via Gnupg-users:
> >> maybe it's of interest for some of you that the development of
> >> Gn
Am 28.05.25 um 09:38 schrieb Daniel Brandes:
Am 28.05.25 um 07:38 schrieb Christoph Klassen via Gnupg-users:
maybe it's of interest for some of you that the development of GnuPG
for OS X ended in March this year
How does that affect third-party implementations like GPGtools and
Thunde
- A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
- A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
: nicht importiert: 2
[GNUPG:] FAILURE gpgsm-exit 50331649
test@localhost:~> gpgsm --version
gpgsm (GnuPG) 2.5.7
libgcrypt 1.11.1
libksba 1.6.7
Copyright (C) 2025 g10 Code GmbH
License GNU GPL-3.0-or-later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you
On 6/6/2025 14:32:41, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 21:14, aslamK said:
However, if 'log-file' is set in gpg.conf, then the following does not
override it; the output is written to the log-file but not to stderr:
gpg --logger-fd 2 --verify file_to_
e.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
:philipe_...@hotmail.com>
Please let me know if you need any further information.
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
Philipe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 6/1/2025 16:54:19, Richard Stoughton via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:09 AM Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:40, Richard Stoughton said:
creates the final signatures. This could be done in a much more
efficient way if GnuPG would be able to create signatures with
Hi,
congratulations on the new release!
(Just did the Fediverse news:
https://mstdn.social/@GnuPG/114618339067357870
)
Am Montag 02 Juni 2025 18:10:17 schrieb Werner Koch:
> This release is another one in a series of public
> testing releases eventually leading to a new stable versi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:10, Werner Koch said:
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
> version 2.5.7. This release is another one in a series of public
> testing releases eventually leading to a new stable version 2.7.
Of course the above line should read
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
version 2.5.7. This release is another one in a series of public
testing releases eventually leading to a new stable version 2.7.
The main features in the 2.6 series are improvements for 64 bit Windows
and the
ar-request-signature/resources/docs/design.md?ref_type=heads
[1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4880#section-5.2.3
[2]:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-koch-librepgp-03.html#name-version-4-and-5-signature-p
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
On 6/1/25 09:54, Richard Stoughton via Gnupg-users wrote:
[...]
So we'll try another approach to preserve the security level of M on L:
H injects a secret nonce into a build run on M. M uses the nonce to
create a MAC for each artifact it creates. M pushes the MACs along
with the artifacts
d is inserted,
> w/the correct PIN is entered, and M never gains access to read the secret.
Currently M are short-lived cloud instances that run the build process
without user interaction. I don't see how to use a HSM or similar
hardware in this case.
____
ts. The security of the complete
process is limited by M.
The purpose of H is solely to limit access to the private signature
key. M signing the artifacts by itself would require the key to float
around.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:09 AM Werner Koch wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:40, Richard Stoughton said:
>
> > creates the final signatures. This could be done in a much more
> > efficient way if GnuPG would be able to create signatures with hashes
> > instead of t
so what's the point of the signature then?
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users
On Wed, May 28 2025, Christoph Klassen via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Hello,
> Maybe it's of interest for some of you that the development of GnuPG
> for OS X ended in March this year:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gpgosx/docu/Home/.
Does it mean that any product based on GPG will
On Wed, May 28 2025, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> * Daniel Brandes via Gnupg-users:
>> How does that affect third-party implementations like GPGtools and
>> Thunderbird on a Mac?
> It does not affect them. GnuPG for OS X / macOS was a standalone build
> of t
On 29 May 2025, at 15:28, Richard Ulrich via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> By using faketime, I harmonized the timestamp that is part of the signature.
> The
> main difference I see at the moment is the "Digest prefix"
> Even with lots of searching and reading all sorts o
group.com / legal-notices .'
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
* Daniel Brandes via Gnupg-users:
> How does that affect third-party implementations like GPGtools and
> Thunderbird on a Mac?
It does not affect them. GnuPG for OS X / macOS was a standalone build
of the official GnuPG and accompanying libraries (each from source), not
something used as p
Am 28.05.25 um 07:38 schrieb Christoph Klassen via Gnupg-users:
maybe it's of interest for some of you that the development of GnuPG
for OS X ended in March this year
How does that affect third-party implementations like GPGtools and
Thunderbird on a Mac?
Thanks a lot from a regular
Hello,
maybe it's of interest for some of you that the development of GnuPG for
OS X ended in March this year: https://sourceforge.net/p/gpgosx/docu/Home/.
--
Christoph Klassen | https://intevation.de
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer:
Hi Dennis,
Am Montag 26 Mai 2025 17:14:40 schrieb Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users:
> I have tried repeatedly with emails to the "-request" address wherein I
> always get _two_ replies which request that I confirm the request to
> unsubscribe. I reply to both of them with only t
On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 13:09, Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
>
> I have tried repeatedly with emails to the "-request" address wherein I
> always get _two_ replies which request that I confirm the request to
> unsubscribe.
> Always un
in Okular. CVSS Base Score: 8.1 (v3.1)
Details https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2025-6367
(alternative ids: CVE-2025-27363, GHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp)
There are other good things in Gpg4win 4.4.1, for example
* improvements in the Outlook Add-in (GpgOL)
* a better Kleopatra
* GnuPG
cessed. It seems the mailman interface/software is a tad buggy?
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sun, May 25 2025, Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I think the Pyromania's question was because:
> .Service != .socket
Yes. Thanks.
> It seems reasonable to mask both the .service and .socket
> units if they exist. While the .service might only be
> sock
f you know you don't ever want it to be
started, masking it won't hurt. At worst, it's mild
overkill.
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Tue, May 20 2025, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. I have never seen that because only looked into
> the doc/gnupg2 directory and not into the multitude of other doc
> diretcories. The GnuPG README now tells:
> If your systems already comes with a sys
ils.
Best,
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
a
You may want to use the gpgme interface which interprets the status
codes for you and returns higher level info. There is also a
gpgme-json tool as a kind of language binding to gpgme.
> user I wish gnupg could emit less confusing a little more /human/
> parsable info.
Human parseable info
Ingo Klöcker writes:
- [GNUPG:] KEY_CONSIDERED 3 (what does the 3 stand for?)
- [GNUPG:] INV_SGNR 9
- [GNUPG:] FAILURE sign 54
Thank you Ingo for the useful explaination. Just a few additional notes (mostly for my own
curiosity).
- "KEY_CONSIDERED 3"
uses a flag (3) wh
li=0;
} else {
*(line+li) = *(buffer+i);
if(++li >= 4096) {
*(line+li) = 0;
li = 0;
}
}
}
i
On 5/21/2025 17:09:21, Jay Acuna wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:00 AM Jakob Bohm via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Please stop suggesting less secure solutions to those who have already set
up high security compartmentalized systems. It makes you look malicious .
These are not less secure solutions
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 9:00 AM Jakob Bohm via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Please stop suggesting less secure solutions to those who have already set
> up high security compartmentalized systems. It makes you look malicious .
These are not less secure solutions. It is not a fact
On 5/19/2025 18:08:07, Jay Acuna via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 6:58 AM Richard Stoughton wrote:
To "sign" the hash on M, it would be necessary to inject a one-time
secret (e.g. a OpenPGP private key
This would seem to invalidate H's purpose for existing. At th
On 5/13/2025 10:09:13, Francesco Ariis wrote:
Hello Atod,
Il 13 maggio 2025 alle 03:01 Atod Bora via Gnupg-users ha scritto:
What are the best practices and/or pros/cons of including your email
address on the key server? For instance now, I have not included my
email address, yet it is in the
I use GnuPG 2.4.7 on Debian/trixie. I recently renewed a set of subkeys but forgot to update the
signing key in my git config, so commits failed with a message like this:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ git commit -m 'commit description'
e
to the multitude of other doc
diretcories. The GnuPG README now tells:
If your systems already comes with a systemd enabled GnuPG, you
should thus tell it not to start its own GnuPG daemons by running
the following three commands once:
systemctl --user mask --now gpg-agent.s
...@us.ibm.com
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
1 - 100 of 4017 matches
Mail list logo
