Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2025-05-24 Pyromania <pyroma...@disroot.org> wrote: >> On Tue, May 20 2025, Werner Koch wrote: > [...] >>> systemctl --user mask --now dirmngr.socket >>> systemctl --user mask --now keyboxd.socket > [...] > >> systemctl --user mask --now dirmngr.service >> systemctl --user mask --now keyboxd.service > > See above
I think the Pyromania's question was because:
.service != .socket
It seems reasonable to mask both the .service and .socket
units if they exist. While the .service might only be
socket activated, if you know you don't ever want it to be
started, masking it won't hurt. At worst, it's mild
overkill.
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
