Le 13.05.20 à 11:54, Damien Goutte-Gattat a écrit :
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:02:14AM +0200, Sylvain Besençon via
Gnupg-users wrote:
RJH's answer sounds like a good piece of advice, but still, at the
end, we HAVE to to choose which algorithm to use when creating new key
pairs.
No you
will now know what I am doing when I'll use the defaults! :)
Sylvain
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
able
to read or verify stuff that I encrypt and signs?
Would it be because they use older versions or because some software
programs don't implement Curve 25519?
I guess that Curve 25519 is mentioned in the IETF standard, isn't it?
Many thanks,
Best,
Sylvain
___
Best,
Sylvain
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Oh no!! I'm terrible, I have just discovered that I have sent this mail
to the whole mailing list. Sorry to all of you for the inconvenience...
However, this might also be an opportunity for me to send my call to the
whole community.
Le 26.06.19 à 11:47, BESENCON Sylvain via Gnupg-users a
Dear Daniel Kahn Gillmor,
My name is Sylvain Besençon, I am an anthropologist from the university
of Fribourg, Switzerland, and I am doing a research for my PhD on the
maintenance work of OpenPGP implementations, not from a technical point
of view but rather from a socio-historical perspective
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:29:26PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 10/26/2013 3:40 PM, Sylvain wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer. To foster spending less time on these
> > discussions, how about this? :)
>
> Hi! I'm the quasi-official FAQ maintainer. You can
+use to audit the used software (firmware, OS, libs, apps), which
+often are the weak link of the security chain.
** Why does it sometimes take so long to create keys?
:PROPERTIES:
Cheers!
Sylvain
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnu
reasons to do so?
Well I've heard that in security, more bits isn't necessarily more
secure, depending on the algorithm.
Plus, following this principle, why doesn't gnupg default to 4096 if
there isn't any reason not to? I would suppose that if gnupg defaults
to 2048,
Hi,
I saw a lot of activity in the Debian project about upgrading to a
4096 RSA key,
e.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/09/msg3.html
However GnuPG's default is 2048.
Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg?
Cheers!
Sy
10 matches
Mail list logo
