Hi,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs wrote:
> Thank you for all your replies. It seems that multiple separate keys is
> the way to go for me. Is it socially acceptable to ask someone to sign
> several keys, for example during key signing event? Is this a common
> occur
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:00:40AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > It'd be nice if there was a signature notation that specifies which
> > UID(s) this signature would be valid for.
> Unless i'm misunderstanding your suggestion, there is no need for such a
> notation -- OpenPGP certific
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:15:24PM +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs wrote:
> If I have multiple not related e-mail accounts, is it better to create
> one key pair with multiple identities or a separate key pair for every
> account?
That depends on your use case mostly. I use a single key with multi
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:26:07PM -0700, BernePGP wrote:
> After the recipient has loaded the programe he generates a personal key but
> does he do as I have done and copy out his public key in a wordfile and send
> it to me?
Essentially, yes.
It is usually advisable to use plain text file
Hi,
on a related note: I have two cards, one is full sized, one SIM sized,
and two different readers, one of which is an USB stick that is inserted
only when needed. Using such a setup is a serious hassle, because I need
to reconfigure the reader-port everytime I want to use the other card.
Can t
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:51:50AM +0200, Snaky Love wrote:
> I would like to encrypt communication in groups - not instant communication
> like e.g. messengers like pidgin, but like on a forum or web-group - the
> data persists in an archive, where the communication can be read. Members
> a
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:57:33PM +0200, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
> I want to have the private key securely stored in the hardware
> (SmartCard or HSM), asymmetric crypto ops securely performed in the
> hardware and I'm concerned with the hardware becoming a bottleneck.
> I suspect that
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> https://www.privacyfoundation.de/crypto_stick/
> Within an email developers stated the usb stick itself could handle keys with
> a length of 4096 but gnupg doesn't support these key lengths.
The key length is limited by the ca
