On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:02:54AM +, kunle wrote in
<4f34f95e.3080...@yahoo.com>:
pls how can l install gnupg because l dont computer command at all or
may be u can show me simple way to install it. Thanks
This is way too little information for anyone to help you.
What are you trying, wha
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:08:26PM -0500, Jean-David wrote in
<4f283c2a.6070...@verizon.net>:
Remco Rijnders wrote:
I appreciate signed mails on this list (and any other lists). Most
problems these days on the internet are, in my opinion, related to
people being completely anonymous.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:41:16PM +, MFPA wrote in
<516876184.20120131214116@my_localhost>:
That's exactly what the --not-dash-escaped option is
for. Granted, it's not portable to some other PGP
implemetations, but if there is any mailing list in
world in which it would be acceptable, I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Steve wrote in
<946fffc5-a191-4073-9d69-fc7fdc695...@gpgtools.org>:
Of course, I really feel it's better for mailing list traffic to not
be signed at all, since usually all it gives us is a false sense of
security. A signature from an unvalidated key bel
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:03:59PM -0800, Davi wrote in
:
GnuPG crew,
Thank you in advance for your patience. I am new to Linux, new to Ubuntu,
and new the GnuPG and this is the first time I am trying to do any of this.
I successfully downloaded a package named gnupg-2.0.18.tar.bz2 from
gnupg.or
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 06:49:27AM -0500, gerry wrote in
<005801ccddb3$30d9b400$928d1c00$@abilitybusinesscomputerservices.com>:
gnupg-users@gnupg.org
This is not directed at any one individual;
also, other mailing lists have the same problem imho.
Ideally, (my ideal), the generic "one" wo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:57:34PM +0100, Ludovic wrote in
<4f142cce.9020...@hirlimann.net>:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get as much possible people to a key party i'll organize
in 3 weeks. What are my best options , besides contacting local users
via biglumber, posting to upcoming.org and contacting
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:35:09PM +0100, MFPA wrote in
<531058786.20110825193509@my_localhost>:
Hi
On Thursday 25 August 2011 at 7:02:52 PM, in
, Aaron Toponce wrote:
If I have a public keyring of all the attendees of the
party, then I will want to sign every key in that
keyring.
You coul
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:02:52PM -0600, Aaron wrote in
<4e568e4c.8080...@gmail.com>:
On 08/25/2011 11:56 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Do you want to sign every key in your keyring? If so, it's not hard to
get gpg to enumerate all of your keys in a machine-parsable format (see
--with-colon
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:15:27AM -0400, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
gpg: conflicting commands
$
I'm sure I'm overlooking something simple, but I'm just not seeing it
today.
Okay -- I found the dash in "clear-sign"--which should read "clearsign".
Of course I find it shortly after
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
Anybody also attending the Desktop Summit in Berlin would be interested in
some GPG key signing?
I won't be there, but I will attend the keysigning in Bonn [1] at FrOSCon
[2] on August 20th.
Remco
[1]: http://ksp.froscon.o
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:17:27PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:15:25PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
So, it appears I'm missing some configuration in Mutt then, as it remains
as the PGP message without any attempt to get to the plain text. Also, how
do you get the plain
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Still with the HTML? This excerpt is from the Fedora mail list but it
applies to all lists:
It applies to those lists which have a policy on HTML mail identical to
that of the Fedora mailing list. This is not the same as "all
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:26:03PM +0100, Martin Gollowitzer wrote:
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
You might want to read [1,2,3].
[1] https://wiki.fsfe.org/Fellows/mk/EmailGu
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:06:20AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Although I've received other email from the OP that did not include
the footer, so now I'm curious to know where it came from, especially
since he is using the GMail MX servers.
Hi Ben,
I exchanged a few emails off list with the O
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:56:11PM -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On a side note, you may wish to re-evaluate your email signature.
Confidentiality notices are usually annoying to most recipients,
especially on mailing lists, where the email is publicly accessible on
the Internet for all to see.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:58:41PM +, Andrew Long wrote:
I downloaded the new package and the detached key, but have not yet done
anything with them. The email, when processed by my current macgpg2
installation (2.0.14) complains about
Bad signature from Benjamin Donnachie !
No signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I have a file encrypted to two different User ID's, both for which I
have the public keys as well as the secret key. When I try to decrypt
the file, it always prompts me for the passphrase of user A, while I'd
like to decrypt it using the pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
