On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:41:16PM +0000, MFPA wrote in <516876184.20120131214116@my_localhost>:

That's exactly what the --not-dash-escaped option is
for. Granted,  it's not portable to some other PGP
implemetations, but if there is  any mailing list in
world in which it would be acceptable, I  would think
it would be this one! :)

I'm guessing that's what you did, and the cut mark was not munged.
Trying the same right back at ya.

Are you sure this is what the option is for? The man page says it is
to enable cleartext signatures to be used with patch files.

And for what it's worth... my client tells me the signature on this particular post you made is invalid. Your other posts to this list all pass the test ;-)

Kind regards,

Remco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to