On Apr 18, 2006 at 16:53 +0200, Philipp Gühring wrote:
> GnuPG has an option called --export-minimal, which exports only the minimal
> key. Unfortunately, GnuPG does not have the same for importing yet, which I
> would need. Is it possible to have a --import-minimal function added to
> GnuPG?
j
On Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06 -0500, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> Last then first. Generally, it is very difficult to intercept email
> en-transit. That was not always the case. There was a time when you
> had hubs and you could listen in to everything on a LAN. Those days are
> gone with switches (m
On Feb 22, 2006 at 21:52 +0100, Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
> I downloaded the latest GpgME version and called configure.
> The last lines it outputes are:
>
> configure: WARNING:
> ***
> *** ttyname() is not thread-safe and ttyname_r() does not exist
> ***
> checking whether we are using the GNU C Libr
On Jan 07, 2006 at 00:10 +0300, lusfert wrote:
> checking whether to enable the BZIP2 compression algorithm... yes
> checking for bzlib.h... no
maybe you must install somthing as bzip-devel?
Vale!
--
Pawel I. Shajdo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnup
On Dec 29, 2005 at 16:37 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Sorry,.. was just an idea due to the comment in the source code:
> "It makes use of special DNS records and notation data to associate a
> mail address with an OpenPGP key."
> And the only (standardized) RR that has to do with sigs I
On Dec 28, 2005 at 00:25 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I'm not sure, but perhaps this utilizes the SIG resrouce record,... have
> a look at RFC 2535 about DNSSEC (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2535.txt).
Seems nothing with DNSSEC.
IIRC, after looking into util/pka.c, this searches in DNS T
On Dec 27, 2005 at 16:30 -0500, John W. Moore III wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> While waiting for Werner or David; I'll share what I "know" about PKA in
> 1.4.3cvs:
>
> * Implemented Public Key Association (PKA) trust sub model. This
> is an optional trust model on top o
On Dec 26, 2005 at 23:21 -0500, John W. Moore III wrote:
> > Without context it is difficult to tell.
> > My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH.
>
> I believe your "Guess" to be correct. Since the Release of GnuPG 1.4.3
> *will* contain support for PKA Key retrieval (among oth
Salve!
What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words...
Vale!
--
Pawel I. Shajdo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Salve!
Can somebody explain me what is "back signatures"?
Manual not very clear about this.
Vale!
--
Pawel I. Shajdo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:39:22PM +1200, Bernard wrote:
> I found that the --with-colons option returns the most details and
> appears to be more machine readable but I don't know what some fields
> mean.
>
> Where would I find documentation about this?
see doc/DETAILS file in source distribution
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:42:28AM -0700, Christian Stork wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:23:56PM +0400, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:41:53AM -0700, Christian Stork wrote:
> > > gpg: uncompressing failed: unknown compress algorithm
> > >
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:33:45PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
>
> That poses a significant problem when someone loses their key, but has a
> trusted revoker set... there are other situations where someone other
I mean only key signatures,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Ok, that other thread isn't about the GD, but this one is. I think this
> is something that should be discussed and a consensus reached.
>
> Are they a good/bad signer?
> Does something need to be done about them?
> Should they be ap
14 matches
Mail list logo
