Re: Is a document signed with hellosign legally binding?

2013-01-04 Thread Morten Kjærulff
Thank you all! So, a bare email is also legally binding, but it can be hard to proove who sent it. Same for hellosign.com, it can be hard to proove who really signed a document there, and it was that fact that confused me, I made "legally binding" and "proove who signed" the same thing. /Morten

Is a document signed with hellosign legally binding?

2013-01-03 Thread Morten Kjærulff
Hi, This is a off topic question, but I do not know where to go with it. I just signed up with hellosign.com. It is a service where you upload an image file with your handwritten signature. Later on you can upload a document and they will merge your signature and document, and mail it to the one

Re: Encrypting for multiple users

2010-01-21 Thread Morten Kjærulff
Hi, Is it the 4th user or "user4" that has a problem? That is, who gets the problem with this: gpg -r -r -r -r --encrypt file.txt /Morten -- www.MortenKjarulff.dk On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Mohan Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi, > > I am encrypting for multiple recipients. > > gpg -r -r

Re: Is it safe to put an encrypted file on a public web server

2009-11-12 Thread Morten Kjærulff
Thanks. I get the point - for me, any minimal encryption would be enough, as nobody cares about my photos of my famely. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Kevin Kammer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:01:09AM -0500 > Also sprach David Shaw: >> AES256 is probably the best all-round choice in GPG

Is it safe to put an encrypted file on a public web server

2009-11-11 Thread Morten Kjærulff
Hi, I am new here, so sorry if I ask stupid questions. I would like to use my unused storage on various web servers for backup of my personal data, including the file with all my passwords. Q1) Assume that I make a good passphrase, would it then be safe to encrypt my backup with "gpg --symmetric