Thank you all!
So, a bare email is also legally binding, but it can be hard to proove who
sent it. Same for hellosign.com, it can be hard to proove who really signed
a document there, and it was that fact that confused me, I made "legally
binding" and "proove who signed" the same thing.
/Morten
Hi,
This is a off topic question, but I do not know where to go with it.
I just signed up with hellosign.com. It is a service where you upload an
image file with your handwritten signature. Later on you can upload a
document and they will merge your signature and document, and mail it to
the one
Hi,
Is it the 4th user or "user4" that has a problem? That is, who gets
the problem with this:
gpg -r -r -r -r --encrypt file.txt
/Morten
--
www.MortenKjarulff.dk
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Mohan Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am encrypting for multiple recipients.
>
> gpg -r -r
Thanks. I get the point - for me, any minimal encryption would be
enough, as nobody cares about my photos of my famely.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Kevin Kammer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:01:09AM -0500
> Also sprach David Shaw:
>> AES256 is probably the best all-round choice in GPG
Hi,
I am new here, so sorry if I ask stupid questions.
I would like to use my unused storage on various web servers for
backup of my personal data, including the file with all my passwords.
Q1) Assume that I make a good passphrase, would it then be safe to
encrypt my backup with "gpg --symmetric