te:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 04/07/2006 09:56 PM, John M Church wrote:
Not sure if "mask the passphrase in a non-obvious way" does justice to
encrypting it with a filter and strong algorithm - ref.
<http://search.cpan.org/~beatnik/Filter-CBC-0.09/
u - access to my script should be extremely
limited both from a permissions standpoint and location (firewall).
John_inDenver
Qed wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 04/07/2006 04:16 PM, John M Church wrote:
I think it's simplistic to just brush-
ead-only media.) The second machine is entrusted with
knowledge of how to decrypt, but in exchange it is tightly secured and
specialized for a single task.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John M Church
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006
I think it's simplistic to just brush-off this request as a user who
wants convenience. There are very valid reasons for automated
decryption. I'm working a similar project (and have my own issue - see
"Automated Decryption via Script Running Setuid" written 4/5/06). Seems
to me if you prote
Searched the archives back through Oct. '05 and didn't see a solution to
my problem...
Bottom line to problem: If a script running setuid as userA but called
by userB contains a GPG command, GPG responds with userB information
instead of userA.
I have a perl script 'parseMail_andSubmit_toDB.pl
