On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 15:20, Hank Ivy wrote:
> What should I take? How should I organize, and protect the IDs?
Take two. A driver's license and a passport would be best, though one
probably authenticated you for the other. To protect them, put them
in your wallet or pocket.
James
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 1:46 PM, Snaky Love wrote:
> About GSWoT - does this cover my described use-case? I don´t quite get
> it from a first glance on the website...
Actually, no, not at all.
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CAPM CGFM
-BEGIN PGP SIG
ared among all members.
I wonder if the key management issue would be simpler if there were a
master key, group members were an ADK, and GnuPGP supported ADK.
James
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMWg8oAAoJEHPMAEw+5CSeBJQH/3
On 7/23/10 11:51 AM, war_is_pe...@privatdemail.net wrote:
> Does that make sense? Are there known problems if a (primary) user ID
> doesn't contain any email address?
Nope! Check out 0xE6602099 for my key with a primary uid of "James
Patrick Howard, II".
James
--
Jam
On 7/16/10 12:50 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> Do you definitely have to replug it, or is killing scdaemon sufficient?
Both are necessary.
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.
it back in.
I am using a Mac with 10.6.x and have done this with MacGPG 2.0.12 and
2.0.14.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists
1024 with the three of them taking up 3072 total.
I noted that, too, but I currently have three 2048 bit keys on my card.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
low signatures with hashes other than SHA1 or RIPEMD160.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gn
On 5/25/10 10:07 AM, Hauke Laging wrote:
> What is the gpg version you use? IIRC You need 2.0.13 or 2.0.14 for 2048 bit
> keys on a smartcard.
That did the trick! I was on 2.0.12 and moved to 2.0.14.
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
j...@jameshow
e card
I take it I am missing something obvious in this?
James
- --
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM
j...@jameshoward.us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL+87BAAoJEHPMAEw+5CSeGCQH/3cv2suaLFZTptKkALg2XZa6
FRCpJ4um4QsO+xwwdNBQ314XYSWBjmVkvrwHIAYHkzBDwdbbRpH+yrZz41S6T98/
EIRfY4K5zI
/bit.ly/4eTg6z
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS
j...@jameshoward.us
pgp529PvAKpnX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
flags list at all if you reset all key flags.
This makes a lot of sense, now. Thank you for the clarification.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
as the actual effect of turning them all on instead...
Well, that was kind of my point, but was also confused by the certifying
subkey and may have undually dwelt on it.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
howar...@thermopylae:~$
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
on the issue and realize that accepted opinion may
> change.
I noticed this, too. But since I also do not claim any special wisdom
on the issue, I was hoping someone would. Since we all seem to agree
that communication and storage is difficult to distinguish, can someone
suggest why different
tion key types?
Thank you, James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed Jul 22 2009 16:12:34 GMT-0400 (EDT) , Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 07/22/2009 03:59 PM, James P. Howard, II wrote:
>> I have created a 2048-bit RSA subkey that is authentication only.
>> I'd like to use this with SSH. A bit of Googling suggests this
>> cann
I have created a 2048-bit RSA subkey that is authentication only. I'd
like to use this with SSH. A bit of Googling suggests this cannot be
used directly unless it is on a smart card, but it isn't clear. Have I
correctly interpreted this?
Thank you,
James
--
James P. Howard,
be verified and as a result, you can see the signature following
the name. More complex variants on this may be possible.
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-use
wouldn't that make more sense on a phone?
>
> In fact, we have a free ZRTP implementaion for quite some time:
> libzrtpcpp. A quick check shows that it is used by Twinkle but any
> SIP software based on ccrtp can make use of this extension.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
&
On Fri Jun 5 10:52:48 2009, David Shaw wrote:
> --allow-secret-key-import is a no-op. It is no longer used for anything.
Really? I could not import last week without it.
howar...@thermopylae:~$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG/MacGPG2) 2.0.11
...
James
--
James P. Howard, II,
> for each of 3 previous commands failed me... Also the same, if I used key
> IDs. How to do it?
When you perform the import, you must use "--allow-secret-key-import"
but unless you intended not to use the master signing key, you should
not use --export-secret-subkeys.
Ja
lsewhere[1], is it bad to convert a subkey into a
>> primary key and use it to sign others?
>
> To do this, you have to have the key in primary key form in the (local)
> web of trust. If you don't, then the signatures won't be used.
Well, I did succeed in doing it last n
ning key.
This leads indirectly to another question: Why can't I sign someone
else's key with a subkey? And on a divergent note, using the black
magic described elsewhere[1], is it bad to convert a subkey into a
primary key and use it to sign others?
James
1. http://atom.smasher.or
the private part of the encryption keypair is used to decrypt
> documents; the public part is used to encrypt them.
Can anyone explain why there is a difference between signing and
encrypting keypairs, even for the same type (RSA)?
James
--
James P. Howard, II, MPA
j...@jameshoward.us
t; Take a look at the ASCII table (man ascii :). There is ^D (EOT - end of
>> transmission) for this. This is used by all systems I'm aware of but
>> window$. Don't know why they use something diffrent, maybe just to be
>> diffrent and break the standard.
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
On Tue Apr 28 21:48:52 2009, Allen Schultz wrote:
> I made a key with default settings. Can I delte the encrypting
> subkey that has not expiration date and remake one with an
> expiration date?
You may be better off revoking the subkey and adding a new encryption
subkey.
James
--
other means instead.
It's best not to obsess over key size. Larger is not better, but it's
not as if it hurts you, either.
There are some ancient keys out there which are 512 bits (and I think
I've seen smaller). Are these likely still secure enough to use?
--
James
t SCO. hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
> A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
>
>
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL P
Aha! My provider fixed a doohickey somewhere (it was an error in a
mail forwarding configuration file) and it now works.
James
On 4/23/08, James P. Howard, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is embarrassing. I've contacted my provider to find out why mail
> is bounci
that. Try this instead:
> >
> > http://jameshoward.us/robot-digital-signature-authority
> >
> > James
> >
> > --
> > James P. Howard, II
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://jameshoward.us
> >
> [...]
>
> Sent a signed test message u
Yep, sorry about that. Try this instead:
http://jameshoward.us/robot-digital-signature-authority
James
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
-Original Message-
From: Sven Radde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:58:09
To:[EMAIL PRO
gt; before time X?
>
> Thanks for any hints, Joh
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
here could be a lot of public keyrings out there with the incorrect
> ID and it won't get revoked by simply deleting it from the original
> key.
>
> Sorry if I misunderstood the point...
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg
previously encrypted files.
James
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
pgpI5NNeO9Oih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
?
Thank you, James
1. http://gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html
--
James P. Howard, II
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameshoward.us
pgpsI34I98Ria.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
36 matches
Mail list logo
