-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/4/10 8:57 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > It's no big deal *for you*. If you want to make a blanket statement of it > being no big deal, you need to take into account the churn on the periphery: > all those people who joined and then left because the key management problem > was nontrivial.
It's worth noting that I have, more or less, dropped off of PGPNET because of the key management issue. They are nontrivial and it is a pain. GSWoT, however, does share information using a key where the private key parts are shared among all members. I wonder if the key management issue would be simpler if there were a master key, group members were an ADK, and GnuPGP supported ADK. James - -- James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMWg8oAAoJEHPMAEw+5CSeBJQH/3tCo8vwsGR0mW5l4ul2YR8j tkkxU7sPsaFk5CBwu9fJYHSRDZ21mddIHyBPyRINjGEnzs9AxpainLJ/rDs6DKE8 Tvd90TVzrH/wCTk8Fac63n+bxvNjZcghXQwitc91157fT5Vbn1u79ALmf+4RbdEK 3hc4cIxlYTO12m1mJ5Yl/nzAwixoeG2o3zBwyLVtEh0J+02RMr55BWGp6op9mqYR bxHlY3CqRQ0qjU2FaYfXXz4OCnhzNfHnRBEjbwdUV8yezUq8wFV7f23Wy9pSO2W+ V/fThm/xX/LN/Hv7eZZgX3S8NY4qhDcoX0zqPwnQ2lkjDIGO8GJCm11k18doMlo= =HSCY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
