Re: ftp down

2024-08-22 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > Those who already have GPG and the release-signing keys can verify the > next version of GPG that way. To anyone who doesn't already have GPG, > HTTPS is the best integrity protection they will get. Meeting Werner in person may be

Re: ftp down

2024-08-22 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 07:12:37PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote: > > [...] > > > I would encourage resuming FTP distribution, since I see no > > > plausible security benefit to omitting it. > > > > For the download usecase, I see no plausible benefit to providing FTP > > service in

Re: out-of-key UIDs [was: ADK's]

2023-05-05 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:01:36AM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > I tried something like this with my MUA, I believe that doesn't work: > > it first looks for appropriate keys, probably using --list-keys; > > in fact, it insists on choosing a single key when multiple ones > > are available. >

Re: out-of-key UIDs [was: ADK's]

2023-05-04 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:52:54AM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > $ gpg --group fn...@test.eu=BD9D4DEE7B2FF1CBEF2EE0C4E0ACD3E0CBE7874A > > --list-keys fn...@test.eu > > gpg: error reading key: No public key ... > —list-keys doesn’t expand groups. Try this instead: > > > andrewg@serenity % gp

Re: out-of-key UIDs [was: ADK's]

2023-05-03 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 1 May 2023, at 12:40, Ineiev via Gnupg-users wrote: > > now, I generate a key > > for y...@guan.edu locally and add 0123456789ABCDEF as an ADK (BTW, > > will GnuPG complain if the only encryption-capable

Re: ADK's

2023-05-01 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:52:10PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote: > > That is an almost prototypical example. In that case, the "archive" key > would actually be the main subkey, and the list recipients' personal keys > would be attached as ADKs. > > Another example: suppose I ha

Re: ADK's

2023-04-30 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 05:41:31PM +0200, Johan Wevers via Gnupg-users wrote: > > All I want is an option to ignore adk's - and it should not claim > anything else than that. Can't you remove ADK subkeys from your keyring? signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___

Re: Key Management - BSI had send private key instead of public key

2021-11-18 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Rainer Fiebig via Gnupg-users wrote: > That's kind of a misconception: as English is a western germanic > language it's not that German made its way into English but English is > *based* on German. To be precise, not on German---it's based on the common an

Re: make check -> libgcrypt is too old

2021-11-10 Thread Ineiev via Gnupg-users
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:13:18AM +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote: > > Not a good idea. That may break things. It is better to install > libgcrypt and the other libs to /user/local/lib and then set > LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly (or fix search order in ld.so.conf). make install usually