On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 1 May 2023, at 12:40, Ineiev via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > now, I generate a key > > for y...@guan.edu locally and add 0123456789ABCDEF as an ADK (BTW, > > will GnuPG complain if the only encryption-capable subkey is ADK? > > Or you could just use an alias…?
I don't think I fully understand what you mean. $ gpg --group fn...@test.eu=BD9D4DEE7B2FF1CBEF2EE0C4E0ACD3E0CBE7874A --list-keys fn...@test.eu gpg: error reading key: No public key $ gpg --list-keys BD9D4DEE7B2FF1CBEF2EE0C4E0ACD3E0CBE7874A | head -n1 pub rsa2048 2014-10-21 [SC] [expires: 2024-10-17] $ gpg --version | head -n2 gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.41 libgcrypt 1.8.10
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
