On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Those who already have GPG and the release-signing keys can verify the
> next version of GPG that way. To anyone who doesn't already have GPG,
> HTTPS is the best integrity protection they will get.
Meeting Werner in person may be
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 07:12:37PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I would encourage resuming FTP distribution, since I see no
> > > plausible security benefit to omitting it.
> >
> > For the download usecase, I see no plausible benefit to providing FTP
> > service in
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:01:36AM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> > I tried something like this with my MUA, I believe that doesn't work:
> > it first looks for appropriate keys, probably using --list-keys;
> > in fact, it insists on choosing a single key when multiple ones
> > are available.
>
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:52:54AM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> > $ gpg --group fn...@test.eu=BD9D4DEE7B2FF1CBEF2EE0C4E0ACD3E0CBE7874A
> > --list-keys fn...@test.eu
> > gpg: error reading key: No public key
...
> —list-keys doesn’t expand groups. Try this instead:
>
>
> andrewg@serenity % gp
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 1 May 2023, at 12:40, Ineiev via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > now, I generate a key
> > for y...@guan.edu locally and add 0123456789ABCDEF as an ADK (BTW,
> > will GnuPG complain if the only encryption-capable
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:52:10PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> That is an almost prototypical example. In that case, the "archive" key
> would actually be the main subkey, and the list recipients' personal keys
> would be attached as ADKs.
>
> Another example: suppose I ha
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 05:41:31PM +0200, Johan Wevers via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> All I want is an option to ignore adk's - and it should not claim
> anything else than that.
Can't you remove ADK subkeys from your keyring?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Rainer Fiebig via Gnupg-users wrote:
> That's kind of a misconception: as English is a western germanic
> language it's not that German made its way into English but English is
> *based* on German.
To be precise, not on German---it's based on the common an
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:13:18AM +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> Not a good idea. That may break things. It is better to install
> libgcrypt and the other libs to /user/local/lib and then set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly (or fix search order in ld.so.conf).
make install usually
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:06:22PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2019-01-12 14:25:02 -0500, Ineiev wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Ineiev wrote:
> >> dti@manas:~$ gpg --home h1 --import >
> > Sorry, this is what works:
> >
&
Hello,
Does this reproduce for anyone else?
dti@manas:~$ uname -a
Linux manas 4.4.0-141-generic #167+8.0trisquel2 SMP Tue Jan 1 12:28:32 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
dti@manas:~$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.12
libgcrypt 1.8.4
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 02:12:47PM -0500, Ineiev wrote:
> dti@manas:~$ gpg --home h1 --import
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> Internationalization
>
>
> This version of GnuPG has support for 26 languages with Chinese, Czech,
> French, German, Japanese, Norwegian, Russian, and Ukrainian being almost
> completely translated. We are
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:52:27PM +, Konstantin Gribov wrote:
>
> As an example, many open source devs are publishing their keys which they
> use for signing software releases but rarely for encrypted communication.
On the other hand, they could publish certificates without encrypting
subkey
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:50:15AM +, listo factor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> "...the general purpose
> operating system is fundamentally inadequate for trusted
> operations."
...
> The use of smartcards is to me only a welcome sign that a
> growing segment of gpg users appears to agree with that
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:19:41PM -0600, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>
> Most mailing list I belong to would never do this.
Just for the record: English-speaking Savannah mailing lists do this
unless the owners explicitly request otherwise.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:22:39PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> The root of the problem might be the concept of "public key" and
> "private key". You need to educate users that these are very different
> things but still belong together.
There is one more: "secret key".
signature.asc
Descript
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:33:59AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> & as gpg runs on various bsd & linux etc, any work done on translating
> generic
> gpg to Dutch could be available via OS dependent ports wrappers,
> in case of freebsd:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=gnupg&st
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 06:51:35AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Ineiev of the Free Software Foundation sent me some typos
I feel I ought to disclaim: I do volunteer for the GNU project
(including some unimpressive but prominent tasks) and take part
in a few FSF's campaigns,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:12:59PM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Time for my semi-regular FAQ perusing and updating.
Gorgeous!
> I plan on updating
> the FAQ to include a link to the FSF's email security guide,
Out of curiosity - have you reviewed the latest version of ESD?
signature.asc
De
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 10:57:06AM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 25/12/15 06:19, Ineiev wrote:
> Let's assume one in four words in the dictionary fits the grammar. I
> hope this concurs broadly with what you assumed. Rather than pick four
> random words of the full list, and
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 05:50:47PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
>
> > Und allein dieser Mangel und nichts anderes führte zum Tod.
>
> This is grammatical. There is a subject (or two), a verb, an.. well
> whatever those things are like "zum Tod", I don't often discuss grammar
> in any oth
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:55:50PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:33, n...@goodcrypto.com said:
>
> > GoodCrypto warning: Anyone could have read this message. Use encryption, it
> > works.
>
> That does not make any sense on a public mailling liost. We write here
> for the p
Hello,
$ gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.18
(&c.)
$ gpg --recv-key 0x3DBDDC68
gpg: requesting key 3DBDDC68 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 35853032: rejected by import filter
gpg: Total number processed: 1
When I get the key from keys.gnupg.net using a web browser,
$ gpg --import 3DBDDC68
24 matches
Mail list logo
