bits long, and any
> new fingerprint standard might be longer still.
>
> Your proposal here doesn't mention any sort of versioning for
> fingerprints, or take into account other concerns.
>
> A large discussion about fingerprint encodings for low-bandwidth
> transmission can
f all the dependencies and compiling?
>
> Rant over, please help.
>
> Dave
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left
th 10 Euros, so I'd very much go with the
free version.
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
o stop all these complaints I will add a so called
> real certificate but first I need to move the tracker to another
> machine.
>
>
> Shalom-Salam,
>
>Werner
No need for a wildcard one. Just get one free certificate for each subdomain
from StartSSL.
Cheers,
--
Hugo Osv
On 2015-02-28 12:37, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 28.02.2015 00:48, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>
> > Please, stop spreading the iMessage falacy, it's system offers privacy
> > only from *some* parties, but not from everyone.
>
> I invite you to read my message again.
7;re the right one or not.
Please, stop spreading the iMessage falacy, it's system offers privacy only
from *some* parties, but not from everyone.
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
ere for anyone else interested
in following-up:
https://github.com/GPGTools/GPGTools_Core/commit/5186bade36acedfdc0b76f9f5ddfcfc004ec698b
I'm not aware of any track record of writing bad software in the past either -
I believe they're just human.
Cheers,
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: B
commit/5186bade36acedfdc0b76f9f5ddfcfc004ec698b
However, I'd recomend that you go over the proper support channels first
(rather than merely twitter) before asking that references to the proyect are
deleted.
As stated on https://gpgtools.org/:
Please report any issues you find on our suppor
r.
>
> On 2/14/15 7:49 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
>
> >Pros of GPG/Mime:
> >* It's a lot less ugly for users with no gpg support. The large signature
> >block
> > at the end and the gpg marks are hard to ignore.
>
> Why are you signing mail t
roperability.
>
>
Not necesarily. Writing and testing the code to support non-standard traffic
takes time and effort, and may increase the likelyhood of introducing some bug.
In proyects that don't have a lot of manpower, implementing such compatibility
may be a dealbreaker.
--
Hug
ts support one
with relative ease and require tweaking for the other.
The truth is, none of the two deprecates the other, so there's no strong
convergence, IMHO.
--
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start m
.. info on revoked key ...]
gpg> lsign
Key is revoked. Unable to sign.
I believe the reason matters. I can even sit down with the owner of the key and
verify his ID and fingerprint and sign it, meaning "this key belongs to this
person, but was superseeded a week ago". If actually
ard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
> You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
> My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
I haven't read the RFC, so I don't know if something is define in this exact
scenario, but it does sound
On 2015-02-09 14:28, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 08/02/15 20:06, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > Does this mean that if someone revokes their key today, *all past*
> > signatures become invalid?
>
> I believe so, yes. You should probably have expired it instead, sorry.
>
On 2015-02-08 09:51, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 07/02/15 20:43, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > I don't think I'm doing something wrong, but: Am I? Did I miss something?
>
> Yes, you have interpreted it wrong. What you are doing now is this statement:
>
> "
On 2015-02-09 09:45, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Osvaldo,
>
> Am 07.02.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm trying to edit one of my key's trust, but it keeps showing unknown even
> > after changing it:
> >
> [...]
&
using RSA key ID 1BFBED44
gpg: Good signature from "Hugo Osvaldo Barrera " [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner!
gpg: This could mean that the signature is forged.
gpg: reason for revocation: Key is superseded
gpg: revocation comment: Sup
go Osvaldo Barrera
[ revoked] (2) Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
[ revoked] (3) Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
[ revoked] (4) Hugo Osvaldo Barrera (Work Account)
gpg> trust
pub rsa2048/1BFBED44
created: 2010-10-07 expires: never usage: SCA
trust: full validity:
19 matches
Mail list logo
