Re: Signature packets without (whatever)

2005-10-25 Thread Erwan David
on is: how do I find the offending keys? > > Or should I just batch-clean the lot? I got this when I retrieved the PGP GD key via hkp. REmoving this key from my keyring was enough to suppress those messages. -- Erwan David == Trusted Log

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, Erwan David disait > Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > > > > > But you can sign the new user Id with the old one saying "yes I'm > > > the same person, o

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > > > But you can sign the new user Id with the old one saying "yes I'm > > the same person, only with a different address". > > You're talking abo

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:08:07AM +0200, Realos wrote: > > I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a > > subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in combination > > my public key. > > > > Does it mean revoking a subk

Re: Modifying an uid, can it be done?

2005-10-17 Thread Erwan David
Le Mon 17/10/2005, Ismael Valladolid Torres disait > Looks like it would be enough deleting uid 1 and setting uid 2 and > primary, then it would "look like" I had edited the first uid. However > in that case I lose the "ultimate" tag to the left of the primary key. > What does this tag mean here?

Re: trouble decrypting AES256 symmetric encrypted file

2005-09-23 Thread Erwan David
called "Central Directory"). WIthout the end of the file, not very much can be done on the archive... -- Erwan David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: No Debian package for 1.4.2

2005-09-09 Thread Erwan David
Le Fri 9/09/2005, Roscoe disait > I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in > - and not new vewsions. > (I maybe wrong on that.) > (Naturally that only applies to stable..) But unsable still has 1.4.1 -- Erwan ___ Gnupg-us

Re: Keyservers and the future

2005-05-19 Thread Erwan David
Le 19/05/05 21:15, Radu Hociung a écrit: Hello all, I'm researching email authentication, and it looks like there is some promise in using cryptographic signatures. Currently there are hundreds of millions of domain names, and tens of millions of domain name owners. Depending on proposal, email aut