ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a
receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a
mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do
presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B,
responsável pelo
A friends had to re-install gpg4win as a result of a hard disk
failure. Since then, all encrypted files received from her come with
a warning "Not enough information to check signature validity." What
can I or she, do to eliminate this message?
Sincerely,
Marshall D. Abrams
T
Hi there,
I've been using OpenPGP smartcard to decrypt a keyfile to my drive
partition with gpg.
This worked until it broke after system upgrade some time around
November 2017 (I do not have the pacman pkg cache from that time).
> uname -a
Linux username 4.14.15-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT
Hi,
I'm currently running Fedora 25 with GnuPG v2.13 installed.
I want to upgrade to v2.1.23 by manually compiling.
I have downloaded:
npth 1.5
libgpg-error 1.27
libgcrypt 1.8
libksba 1.3.5
libassuan 2.4.3
gnupg-2.1.23
Read the README and INSTALL for gnupg-2.1.23, which instructed to install
th
Still need your help guys. The syntax listed below works (or I think it
does) but how do I verify that the file was encrypted with key ID-A and
signed with key ID-B? When I type "gpg filename.pgp" I get the information
about encryption key but nothing mentions ID-B signing key. I am asking
beca
Thank you to all who replied. The command line listed below works like a
charm. I guess, I just have to remove the password from the signing key.
One more question, is there a way to force GPG to produce output with PGP
extension?
From
I am struggling with GPG command line that will encrypt file with key A and
sign it with key B. Any help would be appreciated. Also, is there a way to
provide the password for the signing key in the command line? I am trying
to automate encrypting files.
Thanks
___
Hi,
It used to work just fine, and on a new machine, after importing publikey
subkeys, `gpg --card-status` would just create secure stubs so that the gpg
smartcard can be used.
Now it is not happening. How to debug what is the issue?
Regards,
--
Dawid Ciężarkiewicz
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am running enigmail 1.5.2 . Is this old? How can I get the
latest? Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: MacGPG2 - http://www.gpgtools.org/macgpg2.html
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/18/2013 12:05 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> So in other words the message can not be read by some govt genius
>> with a rack of computers??
>
> How would I know? Ask a government genius with a rack of
> computers.
>
> I don't know the extent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 11:02 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 10:57 PM, Matt D wrote:
>> Lets assume I run Ubuntu live from USB stick or cd when I need
>> secure messaging so an attacker cannot predict what machine i
>> will sen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 10:33 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 9:41 PM, Matt D wrote:
>> OK, I see. So . . . if brute force is impossible, then what sort
>> of an attack is possible?
>
> Too many to list. Depends largely on y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 08:07 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> what about the 2048-bit DSA part of it?
>
> Search the list archives, please -- this question has been asked
> and answered a great number of times.
>
OK, I see. So . . . if brute force is impossibl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 04:54 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Lets assume the people I email have the same preferences. So
>> how long, and at what cost would it take to brute force crack a
>> captured message?
>
> [sigh]
>
> Not this again. I get very tired
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 01:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Matt D wrote:
>
>> How can I find whats on my list?
>
> gpg --edit-key (thekey) showpref
>
> You can see your own, or anyone else's preferen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 02:28 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Thanks a bunch that was easy. So mine is 2048 with AES-256.
Lets assume the people I email have the same preferences. So how
long, and at what cost would it take to brute force crack a captured
mess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 12:02 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Why would anyone choose AES-128 instead of something more secure,
>> say AES-256?
>
> "More secure" is sort of ... missing the point. It's sort of like
> arguing over whether King Kong or Godzilla i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2013 11:09 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Matt--
>
> On 12/17/2013 10:07 AM, Matt D wrote:
>> Hi! What encryption algorithm do we use in OpenPGP
>
> OpenPGP has "algorithm agility", meaning that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi! What encryption algorithm do we use in OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: MacGPG2 - http://www.gpgtools.org/macgpg2.html
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGB
you can look at the buzz channel function of http://spot-on.sf.net too,
that is a kind of encrypted irc as message list.
regards
2013/9/22 Oliver Verlinden
>
> No, I did not know Schleuder yet. Thank you for the link, I will take a
> look
> at this.
>
>
_
> If you want to be able to verify these message signatures, you
> should set yourself up with a Mail User Agent that can handle
> PGP/MIME-signed messages. Some examples are:
>
> * thunderbird with the enigmail plugin * evolution * claws mail *
> outlook with gpgOL (http://gpg4win.org/about.
Wed 14 Aug 2013 07:32:07 AM EDT using DSA key ID
gpg: BAD signature from "xxx.com>"
however when i do:
gpg --sign-key
it tells me it is signed by my key.
What am i doing wrong here?
Thanks!
--
--
Matt D
___
_search failed: file open error
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
--
--
Matt D
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi Jan
you can try this one: http://goldbug.sourceforge.net/
which is available in version 02.
It has OpenSSL and gpg method, so additional layers of security.
Regards
2013/7/25
> Hi everybody,
>
> why should I trust gpg4win? I have doubts since it was ordered by the
> "Bundesamt für Sicherheit
I think the RFC you mention is more a "reply" protocol, rather than an
"echo protocol" with a "total algorhytmus" utilized by this.
A RFC has to be written still. Anyone? It s still a good research project
for students.
The TTL seems to be replaced by bounces in the latest lib according to
lib-SVN.
2013/7/28 Henry Hertz Hobbit
> I need mail messages with bad
> host names given in forward rather than backward notation to get
> the mail message past the email scanner and to know if a given
> message or file really did come from the sender / file dropper.
> I don't have any problems giving th
thanks for the your correction .
2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen
> On 7/27/2013 9:32 AM, Randolph D. wrote:
> > what a nonsense, Qt is LGPL and so not GPL...
>
> So it is: the Qt license has changed since I last looked at it. Good
> for them! The OpenSSL/GPL conflict is real
what a nonsense, Qt is LGPL and so not GPL , furthermore the derived
product should not be GPL says the link, it is not about combing two lib.
This is really license soldierness. If that is the only point people pick
out this shows they are not open to new things nor do they ever understand,
what i
Does the friendly License Soldier speaks that OpenSSL is not useable with
Qt gui framework?
2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen
>
> See, e.g., https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html
>
>
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
Hi Peter, see the libgcrypt shown with license here:
# e2e Encryption (PK over SSL: using libgcrypt with LGPLv2.1+ License).
https://sourceforge.net/projects/goldbug/?source=navbar
and I think further releases will show it of course with more consideration
of the used libs,
What would the world be
Thanks for the Information, Robert.
We all need to evaluate this and will come back to you
In case there is a file or txt missing, this have to be corrected.
But personally I would give you the tip, as you said this is not the right
list to discuss this and you yourself are mostly posting about it,
Connection is direct
without a hop. In this model you have security as well and no question for
that Special architecture looks
Should we test the app? Send me your key or the IP of a Server
Thanks
2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen
> On 7/26/2013 10:45 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> > Does anyone
Hi Caro and Robert, yah we should do this. I had a Brief look now, I think
it is a RSA generated, which decrypts the message, then like in PGP the
encryption is combined with an AES in the same envelope, all is Baseto64
and then a session AES key is generated, third all is sent over SSL. So you
hav
the hemlis mobile could be based on the code, right? i think the Teams are
in a Close connection
For a mobile solution there is of course a Qt android compile of the Gold
Bug needed, Instead of looking at Websites, can you Martin compile it for
the mobile android solution? then Hemlis and team deve
Does anyone know, if this tool is really secure?
Fwd:
>>>
DOWNLOAD & PRESS RELEASE 2013-07-27 - English / Deutsch weiter unten
_ _ _
/ | | | | | _ \
| | __ ___ | | __| | |_) |_ _ __ _
| | |_ |/ _ \| |/ _` | _ <| | | |/ _` |
| |__| | (_) | | (_| | |_) | |
http://www.pierros.de/images/Masken_Larven_Larve_Domina_schwarz.jpg
2013/7/7 reynt0 :
> On 07.07.2013, Hauke Laging wrote:
> . . .
>
>> Linux has its cuddly penguin, BSD its devil, openSUSE the
>> chameleon... Whether the GNU gnu increases the fun factor
>> is a difficult question... ;-)
>>
>> I
On Sat, 29 May 2010 19:46:29 -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
>>
>>It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named in the
>>user ID. If you *really* know what yo
On a Linux box, in encrypting a file with gpg, I get this query:
It is NOT certain that the key belongs to the person named
in the user ID. If you *really* know what you are doing,
you may answer the next question with yes.
Use this key anyway? (y/N) n
Now in the context in which th
On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:42:00 -0400, Grant Olson wrote:
[...]
> If you're talking about a static directory, just zip it up and encrypt
> normally.
[...]
I tried to zip a 90G directory tree, but it failed on a bad file
name -- something in a bookmarks directory, I think, but it
doesn't make any d
On Thu, 27 May 2010 12:34:34 +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 00:08:41 Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:42:00 -0400, Grant Olson wrote:
>> > On 5/26/10 10:14 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> >> I would like to use gpg to crea
On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:42:00 -0400, Grant Olson wrote:
> On 5/26/10 10:14 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> I would like to use gpg to create encrypted directories on an external
>> hard drive. I would like to do this for both WinXP and for Linux.
>> Could someone dir
I would like to use gpg to create encrypted directories
on an external hard drive. I would like to do this for
both WinXP and for Linux. Could someone direct me to
appropriate documentation?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnup
Using the certificate splitter
Additional advice for using the on-line certificate splitter. Only
copy the final certificate from the resultant web-page, and not any of
the signing certificates. This is one less thing that can be faked;
Instead, import an already generated Thawte Freemail cert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Li wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I am totally a newcomer for gnupg, and I am reading the "The GNU Privacy
> Handbook", the version string is "$Name: v1_1 $".
>
> In the handbook, all command options is begin with one dash, like this
> "-gen-key"; but o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> John W. Moore III wrote:
>> Robert is a professional Mathematician and actually _loves_ Numbers.
>
> I'm a software engineer nowadays, although my college degrees are on the
> math-heavy side of theoretical computer science.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Faramir wrote:
>> IIRC, once I saw somebody saying 128 bits is more than enough for a
>> good passphrase. And that beyond that lenght, there was no real strengh
>> gains... But maybe I am not recalling it correctly...
>
> Thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear List readers!
http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html
GnuPG needs a pass phrase to protect the primary and
subordinate private keys that you keep in your possession.
You need a Pass phrase to protect your private key.
Enter passphrase:
T
David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:03:12AM +0200, Sven Radde wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 19:49 -0400 schrieb David Shaw:
>>> A revocation certificate, on the other hand, doesn't
>>> have all that much that can be removed. Luckily revocation
>>> certificates are pretty sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bezna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Which is correct?
Are signatures an inherent part of the key
or are they
> stored extrinsically?
>
>
> George
i would put it this way,
when I run gpg in command line mode I create a user ID and a secret
key + a pub
Kush Asthana wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to install GNUPG 1.4.9 on solaris 5.10 with following versions
>
> sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> gcc v 3.4.3
> ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.10-1.482
>
> Following error is encountered evertime I do make
before you run make you
Chris said the following:
> *** You need libgcrypt to build this program.
I had this problem ... and I (re)(re)read the, couch, README part and noticed
that I hadn't noticed a certain key line, located in this clip second from the
bottom .. the phrase "in the order" I had omitted. honestly,
This current line of thought about running gpg2 on the Mac is germane. While
I am currently running compiled 2.0.9, thanks to a *lot* of help from Charly,
I also want to run it in Apple's Mail.app
OK ... here's the rub ...for example, I open Mail and it tells me a series of
missives about no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
working fine here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJH6qH9AAoJEM+FBuO1wKhL5XEP/3XKy/zUomr5ZtpeVOePi4aU
rm3xPbnmX0HmNIJQFAfXboS73b3mbTW5/hknbGK
OK .. I followed a couple of leads in google and there were some references to
Tiger mentioning liklihood loginwindow and startup items my not be honored.
One fix included changing permissions to system and also wheel
did that, restarted computer .. tried decrypting one of charly's emails and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I am totally unable to figure this out after several days of many hours a day
and some great off-list emailing and help. Works on every one else but mine.
MacBook-Pro 2.16 core-duo
OS/X 10.4.11
Compiled and Re-compiled 2.0.8 using ./configure | mak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Robert D. said the following:
|> suddenly I get a notice that Enigmail
| failed to initialize
no idea what I did, however, I did a re-install and all is well now.
The lesson is keep fingers out of plumb-pie sitting on counter in
kitc
John Clizbe said the following:
Second, Note: I am *not* an OS X user, /but/ in Enigmail's Advanced Preferences,
on the Debugging tab, there is an entry for 'Log Directory'. This is usually set
to the location of the user's or system's temp directory, /tmp.
thanks
re; the enigmail group s
I noticed this log-error to console, this AM.
2008-03-13 05:48:13.589 enigmail.js: CreateFileStream: Failed to create
\desktop/enigdbug.txt
Wondering how I can rectify the problem in my OS/X 10.4 sys
and
wondering where enigmail.js is located since I was unable to find it with a
normal se
ow who is a file encrypted for ?
Am
25
Feb
2008
um
8:01
hat
Tracy
D.
Bossong
geschrieben:
>
gpg
--list-packets
should
give
you
a
clue
No,
it
does
not!
does
the
same
as
.
The
only
difference
is
that
gpg
gives
additional
packet
information
before
as
gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
- Original Message
From: Sebastien Chassot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dirk Traulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GnuPG mailing list
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:29:43 AM
Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
On
Mon,
2008-02-25
David Shaw said the following:
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/faq/subkey-cross-certify.html%20for%20more%20information
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/faq/subkey-cross-certify.html
oh, ouch, I am stupido! I must have, or rather *did*, highlight wy too
much for the link, then didn't bother to read the
I was reading traffic from Daigle, on PGP-Basics and noticed a lack of
ability to verify his signed email. In fact, I thought I'd already had his
imported and verified.
The GPG window pop-up was this screenshot seen here:
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/2121/picture1qt8.jpg
a line in it sugge
--recipeint user1 --recipient user2 (or -r for short)
- Original Message
From: Bruce Cowin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 5:16:04 PM
Subject: more than one recipient
This
is
probably
a
dumb,
basic
question
but
is
it
possible
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I noticed today that my Per Recipient Rules list is in sad disarray.
Furthermore, the list is huge, by my standards and patience level.
I would like to push all those entries that have a "Key" associated, up
into the top of the list, but rapidly, no
I was trying to build 2.0.8 on my Intel mac and came across these errors
and found libassuan and libksba but not "Pth" and also wonder
where do I put them so the make-file can find them?
*** You need libassuan with Pth support to build this program.
*** This library is for example availa
Was wondering if I am current and if there is anything new for the mac?
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.7
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
--
Robert D.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg
Robert J. Hansen said the following:
> enable-dsa2 in your gpg.conf?
>
indeed.
I didn't .. do now ...
and also noticed just how many gpg.conf's I own after several different
"installs"
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/9236/picture1mj5.jpg
however, the one I believe that's real lies in
/us
Mac OS/X btw
I was just looking at the Apple's Console log and saw these. I was
wondering what caused them and what I could set to "not" cause them
thanks ...
2007-11-19 18:53:55.157 enigmail.js: Enigmail.parseErrorOutput:
2007-11-19 18:53:55.157 enigmail.js: Enigmail.parseErrorOutput:
statusF
John Clizbe said the following:
> It .looks as if your friend has Enigmail configured to run the installer, not
> the installed program.
did a re-install from your links and we both can send back and forth
encrypted, jut fine now.
However, this started a different problem on her XP machine. Nam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I had my friend set up her XP machine with Thunderbird and gnupg, based,
I believe, on directions obtained here ... so I feel she got the correct
pointers.
However, she is here right now, and when I watch a compose window in
Thunderbird, there is, a
I am sure I goofed. I am unsure how to correct it now that I sent my
keys to the servers.
When I made the revised keys, I put in /name/ and /comment/ and /email addy/
the *comment* part, I should have ignored. However I was thinking of the
line seen often under "Version" a /note/ or /comment/ but
whoops, I goofed the reply and reply-to-all buttons
Ladislav Hagara said the following:
.
> You must run "gpg --edit-key" and then ...
Next question ...
Sub-key generated.
Do I still encrypt to the original public key? And thus, is the sub-key
used automatically? .. I ask because it's not
I tried to generate a key using commands in "Terminal" on my OS/X. This
is actually a learning experience for me done on purpose.
When I used gen-key, I got one, but at the end was told that I'd need to
generate a sub-key that I could use to actually encrypt.
\
\
So,, what I am asking in where
Did someone write that there is some school of thought that RSA is no
longer very strong? Or, is the meaning that it's likely to take 900
years instead of 100 years to crack?
Just curious. I have RSA 4096's ... could change them easily enough if
someone convinced me to do it.
Seeing a thread about smart-cards finally got me to ask a couple of
questions
In a general question, what are the main reasons I would want to buy one?
Are there decent Smart-Cards for Apple MacBooks ?
thank you
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-user
I'm on a MacBook and using Thunderbird version 2.0.0.6 (20070728)
I see no Header of "Reply To:" ... I was looking for it because when I
hit "Reply" to one of the List emails, the compose window popped up with
a message addressed to Robert H. as opposed to the List.
Is this normal? If not, is the
advice.
Mike.
--
Michael D. Berger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
