On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:06:41 +
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
Hello Andrew,
>It is not always feasible to scold your correspondents about their use
>of HTML mail,
True, but when my bank (just one example) tells me about their 'caring
about security' and then spewing HTML left, right, and centre,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:53:59 +0100
David wrote:
Hello David,
>https//gbenet.com/wksdirectory - will this do for my key retrieval?
AIUI, that won't work - there are specific requirements regarding key
location along with directories and files and their naming that are
required.
See https://wiki
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 08:49:36 -0500
Jerry wrote:
Hello Jerry,
>Thanks, that is pretty much what I thought too. I am using claws-mail.
CM can be set up to pick a GPG ID based on various criteria.
In Account settings, look at Plugins/GPG, and make your choice there.
Either;
1) default
2) based on
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 15:40:25 +0100
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>All of which is irrelevant for online transactions. On the shopping
>website, the customer keys in the long card number, the PIN, and the
Entered a card *PIN* into a shopping web site? Really?.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:38:08 +0100
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>Surely things like 1234 can be prevented by software.
Sure.
The question is "Are they?"
I suspect(1) the answer, in many cases, is "No."
(1) My gut feeling - I have no evidence/proof.
--
R
On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:53:44 +
listo factor via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hello listo,
>a piece of information publicly available on the net
>and then depend on "netiquette" for that piece of
>information not be used in a manner the owner finds
To paraphrase what's been said by others (and you app
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:03:57 +0200
Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
Hello Dashamir,
>Thanks a lot. This page indeed has the answers I was looking for.
Glad to have been of service.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Does she
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:28:45 +0200
Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
Hello Dashamir,
>Thanks, but how? Just download the .deb package with `wget` and use
>`dpkg -i package.deb`?
That may well work, but it's possibly ill-advised. I suggest reading
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental, which has all th
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:59:32 -0700
Daniel H. Werner wrote:
Hello Daniel,
>I sent the following message several days ago and am not sure it
Less than 24 hrs, according to time stamps. The list archives would show
that the first copy was received.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blin
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:19:39 -0400
Antony Prince wrote:
Hello Antony,
>May be a reverse lookup issue. Werner mentioned he added a V6 address
>to the server yesterday.
I hope it is something as readily sorted as that (and I hope it already
has been), but the point remains; google are a big eno
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:11:28 +0100
Guan Xin wrote:
Hello Guan,
>Why does it happen?
Google are a law unto themselves.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Looking for something I can call my own
Chairman Of The Bo
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:12:36 +0100
Viktor Dick wrote:
Hello Viktor,
>Thanks, I found it myself but since the sender of a mail to the list
>does not get a copy of it,
It's a gmail-ism; Most people get their list messages sent back to
them, but not gmail users. It's a 'feature' google seem to b
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 21:35:56 +
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>1.4.x should verify the signature from my RSA subkey but report "Can't
>check signature: unknown pubkey algorithm" for the signature from my
>EDDSA subkey.
Unfortunately, GPGME and Claws Mail (p
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:50:23 +
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>Which GnuPG version are you using?
Damn; I always forget some vital bit of info
GnuPG v1.4.19
>Maybe if there are multiple signatures present, your MUA only
>passes on the GnuPG output f
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:47:19 +
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
Hello MFPA,
>I suggested he delete my key and re-import it. He tells me he tried
>that twice and it didn't help. It's a mystery to me.
It's the same for me; A re-import of your key still results in an
error(
On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:55:49 +0200
Peter Lebbing wrote:
Hello Peter,
>equally disrespectful if I hadn't been one of the people at least
>trying.
Whilst it's laudable that people try and help her, I doubt she's even
_reading_ stuff from the list any more. *Seeing* it, yes (obviously).
As such,
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:24:15 +0100
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Hello Ingo,
>of terror. Still this completely pants-on-head absurd policy will
>become reality if those German politicians get what they want.
It's not just in Germany: Politicians across the world utilise similar
scaremongering tactics to
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:45:26 -0400
"Mark H. Wood" wrote:
Hello Mark,
>What sort of mascot would combine the two aspects?
Racoon? Easily recognised so an allusion to identity there. Their face
has a 'mask', alluding to privacy.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious i
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:36:42 +0200
Werner Koch wrote:
Hello Werner,
>On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:24, ivangrun...@gmail.com said:
>> What is with the helpdesk being a list member?
>They are. I have set the moderation flag.
The XOrg list has suffered the same problem.
--
Regards _
/ )
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:45:17 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
Hello Robert,
>IMO, if your client is showing correct PGP/MIME signatures on this list,
>you should file a defect report about your client.
It certainly warrants investigation. I'll check bug tracker and ML
archives to see if it's k
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:48:28 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
Hello Robert,
>Mika is more or less right, except it isn't headers -- it's the PGP/MIME
>attachment separator. Mailman makes a very slight tweak and that's
That makes more sense. I thought I must have been going mad. :-)
>This ma
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:02:57 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
>I am using GMail as headers probably say if you look at them.
The form address is hotmail. Message ID is hotmail, too. gmail *is*
mentioned, but not in any of the transport headers. Anyhow, Robert has
explained where and
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:00:03 +0200
Steve wrote:
Hello Steve,
>not meaning to spark up new discussions about this issue (we've had
>that before). But I really think, the energy invested in this
It was not my intention to "open old wounds" as it were. I was curious
about Mika's statement, which
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:31:09 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
>If you ask on Enigmail mailing list, they will tell you that that
>issue is with Mailman (or other mailing list software) which messes up
>with headers and makes PGP/MIME unverifiable. They will also say that
Headers are ou
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:24:32 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
>Were you able to verify that signature?
Several people use PGP/MIME, all of which verify here, and include the
list headers you seem to be saying get removed. Not only on this list,
but many other lists, too.
I have seen
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:32:17 -0600
Aaron Toponce wrote:
Hello Aaron,
>Please fix your client. I don't know if you can tell, but you are
>breaking the threads. Your client should support the 'in-reply-to' and
vedaa is using Hushmail; A web mail system.
--
Regards _
/ ) "
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:30:30 -0400
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
Hello ved...@nym.hush.com,
Unfortunately, as you suspected, the message I'm replying to did break
threading. It's Hushmail that's at fault, I believe.
>does it require unsubscribing and re-subscribing,
>or is there an easier way?
Sa
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:05 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
> At least Enigmail fails to recognize PGP/MIME signatures on some
> mailman mailing lists.
That would explain the difference in what you and I see; No enigmail
here.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly
On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:30:54 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Hello Mika,
> I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this
> mailing list uses mailing list software which somehow messes up with
> headers and makes PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
Robin's sig verifies okay here.
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:33:12 +0100
"da...@gbenet.com" wrote:
Hello da...@gbenet.com,
> How odd is that? I rechecked the link and it still works
I can confirm MFPA's (and the OP's) findings that the link goers to a
place holder.
Are you, possibly, seeing a locally cached version of that page?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:57:16 -0400
Jerry wrote:
Hello Jerry,
> Why are we even discussing a product that in not and has not been
That's my fault. A misunderstanding of what was being asked for.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever imme
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:21:36 -0600
Aaron Toponce wrote:
Hello Aaron,
> I'm just trying to figure out why people keep saying inline signatures
> are deprecated, when no documented evidence has come forth showing the
Ah, I did indeed misunderstand what was intended.
I first read that inline sigs
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600
Aaron Toponce wrote:
Hello Aaron,
> On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly formatting
> > e-mail messages thereby forcing the use of a deprecated method.
> [citation required]
See the way Outlook E
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:44:38 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
Hello Robert,
> half-dozen of us calling this guy's workplace and getting him in
> trouble just because he had a braino when he left on vacation.
It'd serve him right. Unless his employer pays him to read the list.
--
Regards _
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:11:02 -0600
Charles Blair wrote:
Hello Charles,
> key. However, when I try to verify the signature on the test
> message below, I get a message saying "timeout".
Probably better asked on the CM ML, but as a starter, do you
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:10:52 -0500
"gerry_lowry \(alliston ontario canada \(705\) 250-0112\)"
wrote:
Hello gerry_lowry,
> David . you are sending this over and over and over . I
> have this message 21 times.
I only got one copy here. Maybe a server somewhere between the ML server
an
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:11:10 -0400
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
Hello Robert,
> Because the bank is concerned about the bank's security, not yours.
> The bank exposes itself to no additional risk by sending out HTML
I beg to differ. By sending HTML emails, it means they're likely to end
up *recei
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:09:41 +0200
Werner Koch wrote:
Hello Werner,
> mails with at lest one html part to the bitbucket.
It always puzzles me why banking organisations send html email pointing
out that "we all need to be security conscious" since html is so easily
exploited for nefarious ends.
On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:03:13 +1000
"felipe alvarez" wrote:
Hello felipe,
> They are definately broken. Click on the purple-ish links that are
> most prominent, centre of page.
Whoops! You're right. I didn't even try those, thinking they weren't
links at all, just topic headings.
The links dow
On Tue, 05 May 2009 20:50:24 +0100
Philip wrote:
Hello Philip,
> all the links from http://www.gnupg.org/docs.html are dead
Works for me
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Watching the people get lairy
I Pre
On Sun, 03 May 2009 10:22:49 +0100
Philip wrote:
Hello Philip,
> Does anyone know the official, correct console way to get pgp to
> terminate and output the encrypted text from console?
> I'm amazed that it just doesn't seem to be documented anywhere.
Through trial and error, I found D works.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:26:39 -0600
Allen Schultz wrote:
Hello Allen,
> Now with 644 I cannot access the directory
Correct. Directories need the "execute" bit set, although "execute" is
a misnomer for directories. See the following for an explanat
42 matches
Mail list logo
