On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:11:10 -0400 "Robert J. Hansen" <r...@sixdemonbag.org> wrote:
Hello Robert,
> Because the bank is concerned about the bank's security, not yours.
> The bank exposes itself to no additional risk by sending out HTML
I beg to differ. By sending HTML emails, it means they're likely to end
up *receiving* HTML mail because many people's mailer replies "in kind"
by default, and the users don't alter the default settings.
> Since the risk is borne by you, and the reward -- in the form of a more
> professional-looking communication -- is gained by the bank, it's in
It doesn't look professional if they are talking about security.
> the bank's best interests to send HTML email.
Not when, like Werner and me, it gets consigned straight to the bin.
To be fair to one of the organisations I deal with, a credit card
company, they *do* only send plain text emails. They also rang me to
query some odd transactions on the card. It turns out they were not
made by me, and the card was immediately cancelled.
However, non of that has to do with GPG, so.......
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
Every single one of us
Devil Inside - INXS
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
