Re: NIST 800-57 compatible unattended encryption?

2019-01-21 Thread Ángel
You are missing another point, which is that -in addition to the gpg.conf client preferences- the keys you are encrypting to have preferences, too. In fact, it is noted in the SE answer you linked: > Per default, GnuPG will read the recipient's algorithm preferences and > take the first algorithm

Re: showphoto

2019-01-21 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:09:10 +0100, Ángel stated: >On 2019-01-19 at 11:09 -0500, Jerry wrote: >> gpg> showphoto >> Displaying jpeg photo ID of size 88074 for key 3873063887DEC564 (uid >> 3) >> >> After a few seconds, an error message pops up on the screen. >> >> C:\Users\Gerard\AppData\Local\

Re: showphoto

2019-01-21 Thread Ángel
On 2019-01-19 at 11:09 -0500, Jerry wrote: > gpg> showphoto > Displaying jpeg photo ID of size 88074 for key 3873063887DEC564 (uid 3) > > After a few seconds, an error message pops up on the screen. > > C:\Users\Gerard\AppData\Local\Temp\gpg-62cno9\87DEC564.jpg contains an > invalid path. > > I

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2019-01-21 08:29:35 -0900, justina colmena via Gnupg-users wrote: > How can people be so insufferably rude? How indeed. Justina, please keep discussion on-topic and friendly for this mailing list. Too many of your posts to the list are full of invective, threating assault, or incoherently

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Andrew Gallagher
> On 21 Jan 2019, at 17:29, justina colmena via Gnupg-users > wrote: > > How can people be so insufferably rude? O_o A ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:29:35 -0900, justina colmena via Gnupg-users wrote: [flush] Regards Stefan ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Montag, 21. Januar 2019 18:29:35 CET justina colmena via Gnupg-users wrote: [snip] > You've got email problems at KDE. > > X-Authenticated-User? This header has been added by my email provider, not by KMail. Regards, Ingo ___ Gnupg-users mailing

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread justina colmena via Gnupg-users
On January 19, 2019 9:56:00 AM AKST, "Ingo Klöcker" wrote: >On Samstag, 19. Januar 2019 17:10:38 CET Stefan Claas wrote: >> Method used with GnuPG: >> >> In gpg.conf i put: photo-viewer "cat > %K.%t" >> >> and then i used this one liner: >> >> for filename in ./*.pgp; do gpg --list-keys --list-

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Stefan Claas
On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:21:53 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote: Hi Peter, > - Take the User Attribute Packet > - Strip off the header: 1 byte tag, and in my case, 2 bytes length > (lengths are encoded on 1, 2 or 5 bytes) > - Hash what's left > > So: > > $ gpg --export KEYID | gpgsplit > > Take a fi

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Peter Lebbing
Hello Stefan, On 21/01/2019 12:46, Stefan Claas wrote: > To compute the hash of an image one has to add a 22bytes header > to the image and then the hash will be properly computed. Since I didn't exactly follow the "22 bytes" part I looked at it one more time; I got curious. It turned out I accid

Re: Discrepancies in extracted photo-id images from dumps

2019-01-21 Thread Stefan Claas
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:27:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:22:10 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote: > > On 20/01/2019 17:07, Peter Lebbing wrote: > > > I had a quick scan through the source code, but couldn't find it. > > > > Oops! I was looking at ancient code instead of the

Re: decryption failed: Bad session key

2019-01-21 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 20/01/2019 22:26, Frank Hrebabetzky wrote: > It took me quite some time until I got aware of this. A term like > "key" or "encryption key" would have made it easier for me, the > "session" was somewhat misleading. Yes, it is somewhat unfortunate. It is due to the mechanics of symmetrically-encr

Re: decryption failed: Bad session key

2019-01-21 Thread Frank Hrebabetzky
On 1/20/19 5:34 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: Hi Frank, On 03/01/2019 15:25, Frank Hrebabetzky wrote: gpg: AES256 encrypted data gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase gpg: decryption failed: Bad session key This is also the error message you get when you specify the wrong passphrase. Perhaps you mistyp