Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Lachlan Gunn
Le 2016-12-12 à 03:45, Peter Lebbing a écrit : > My e-mail was 1424 words though, so I am afraid I ended up in your > wishful thinking area. > > The remaining 1607 words are in the sections "Background" and "Option > for advanced users", and those words happen to include the name Lachlan. > Go che

Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Lachlan Gunn
Le 2016-12-12 à 03:45, Peter Lebbing a écrit : > I really like this suggestion! I had to think about it for a while > before I could see a way to make it work. The trouble is that I want > caff to be able to process the file, and for that I need to keep it > having much of the same patterns. I ende

Recording keysigning attendants on phone (was: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?)

2016-12-11 Thread Lachlan Gunn
Le 2016-12-08 à 22:30, Stephan Beck a écrit : > Yes, to your first question. How you would do that via the > hash-on-the-projector method, is not clear to me, though. Would that be > for generating the (initial) list of the organizers as in Sassaman > Efficient (as an additional service for people

Re: Implications of a common private keys directory in 2.1

2016-12-11 Thread Carola Grunwald
Peter Lebbing wrote: >On 11/12/16 20:58, Carola Grunwald wrote: >> With 'problems' i referred to the GenKey bug/feature I reported a few >> hours ago and the IPC instabilities I experienced. Sure, the >> single-sec-keys-depository : multiple-pub-keyrings configuration is a >> design decision, thou

Re: Strange behaviour

2016-12-11 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
On 11 Dec 2016 at 20:43, Stephan Beck wrote: > I'm truly interested in receiving such log files to have a look > into it myself, but the list may be interested as well. If there was > really something "special" about (precisely) my signatures, as you > say, I'd be eager to know, check and take app

(OT) Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 11/12/16 21:37, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Peter's correction was made in a spirit of utterly pedantic attention > to detail [a spirit I share!] Hah! Guilty as charged :-). Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want s

Re: Implications of a common private keys directory in 2.1

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 11/12/16 20:58, Carola Grunwald wrote: > With 'problems' i referred to the GenKey bug/feature I reported a few > hours ago and the IPC instabilities I experienced. Sure, the > single-sec-keys-depository : multiple-pub-keyrings configuration is a > design decision, though one I don't quite unders

Re: Strange behaviour

2016-12-11 Thread Stephan Beck
Matthias Mansfeld: > On 9 Dec 2016 at 14:01, Stephan Beck wrote: > >> Hi Matthias, > [..] >>> Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better >>> local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de >>> >>> Based on something strange on my computer (blocked memory etc. up >

Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> Or you might not because it was based on a stupid thinking error on my > side. Let's make it "a chance of 1 in 2^128", which could be the chance > of you trying a symmetric encryption key and actually being right about it. I'm glad you made the correction: that error was so profound. :) (

Re: Implications of a common private keys directory in 2.1

2016-12-11 Thread Carola Grunwald
Peter Lebbing wrote: >> But what do you mean by 'deprecated for server use'? > >I meant that GnuPG 1.4 is not deprecated for server use. By which I mean >it is pretty much advised against for desktop use. > >I didn't mean that GnuPG 2.x was deprecated for anything at all :-). I see. Thanks for t

Re: Strange behaviour

2016-12-11 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
On 11 Dec 2016 at 13:40, NdK wrote: [...] > I think it could even be realated to some HW issue. Are fans clean? Yes, and all temperatures are under monitoring > Are capacitors OK? Electrolytic ones, the tall cylinders, often > tend to "explode": they usually have an 'X' on the top and that > sho

Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 11/12/16 18:22, Peter Lebbing wrote: > You might recognise the chosen quantity :-). Or you might not because it was based on a stupid thinking error on my side. Let's make it "a chance of 1 in 2^128", which could be the chance of you trying a symmetric encryption key and actually being right ab

Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 08/12/16 15:08, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > Can't they get this from the other participants in the line? Checking > with a few people at random gives reasonable assurance that this is what > was agreed on at the beginning, or they can check them all if they want > to be certain. Personally, I find c

Re: Hybrid keysigning party, your opinion?

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 08/12/16 14:51, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > Personally I am of the mind that anything longer than that email is > wishful thinking, you have to get people to actually follow it. The e-mail wasn't meant to be the text for participants. I've spent all afternoon writing a text at the 33C3 wiki[1], but o

Re: Strange behaviour

2016-12-11 Thread NdK
Il 11/12/2016 11:56, Matthias Mansfeld ha scritto: > Currently I have not the time to go much more in depth and can live > with the fact that in that moment much other stuff on this computer > tends to hang and the "easiest" way for now is to reboot... It is > possible that this behaviour came

Strange behaviour (was: Re: Something strange with .. a specific Signature?)

2016-12-11 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
On 11 Dec 2016 at 9:40, Stephan Beck wrote: > > Stephan Beck: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > Matthias Mansfeld: > >> Hello, maybe someone has similar effects or can give me a hint > >> where to look. If not, it's OK... > >> > >> Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better > >> loc

Re: An attempt at backporting 2.1.16 from Debian sid to Debian jessie

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
I discovered I accidentally wasn't allowing public access to the repository. I've fixed this and you can now download from: https://gitlab.com/DigitalBrains1/alt-debian-gnupg2 The offending setting seemed to have been: Feature Visibility - Repository Push files to be stored in this project No

Re: Something strange with Stephan Becks Signatures?

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
Woa, easy there. While the Subject:-line of the OP wasn't perhaps chosen very wisely, please calm your tone. I don't think the OP has it in for you (though it is a possibility, but let's assume good faith). It seems like he has a killer issue, and if there really is a correlation to opening your me

Re: Strange behaviour (was: Re: Something strange with .. a specific Signature?)

2016-12-11 Thread Matthias Mansfeld
On 9 Dec 2016 at 14:01, Stephan Beck wrote: > Hi Matthias, [..] > > Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better > > local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de > > > > Based on something strange on my computer (blocked memory etc. up > to > > explorer.exe freez

Re: Implications of a common private keys directory in 2.1

2016-12-11 Thread Peter Lebbing
I'm going to respond to a few points that I already know my answer to. I might not actually have all that much interesting to say about the more complicated points, though... > But what do you mean by 'deprecated for server use'? I meant that GnuPG 1.4 is not deprecated for server use. By which I

Re: Something strange with Stephan Becks Signatures?

2016-12-11 Thread Stephan Beck
Stephan Beck: > Hi Matthias, > > Matthias Mansfeld: >> Hello, maybe someone has similar effects or can give me a hint where >> to look. If not, it's OK... >> >> Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better >> local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de >> >> Ba