On 11 Dec 2016 at 20:43, Stephan Beck wrote: > I'm truly interested in receiving such log files to have a look > into it myself, but the list may be interested as well. If there was > really something "special" about (precisely) my signatures, as you > say, I'd be eager to know, check and take appropriate measures. > Whereas you can live with the fact.
I will activate logging in PMail (in GPGRelay it is already running) and post it (as zipped attachment would be fine?... I just need to purge the passwords in the logfiles...). How can I start the most verbose logging from GnuPG itself (gpg.conf option?) Please let me a few days time for this stuff, because the GnuPG problem itself has currently no show-stopper priority (other stuff must be done.... some printed wired board layouts ready before Xmas, my main business...) Regards Matthias PS.: > Ah, and I'd urgently recommend to revoke (or have expired) at least > the 1024 bit subkey for encryption, as it's obsolete (for some years > now). OK, these keys are rather old... I think I prefer expire (.. a bit afraid of making some mistakes with revokation stuff and then messing up the whole keys....) The remainig subkey (2048 bit RSA) should be fine for encryption? -- OpenPGP: http://www.mansfeld-elektronik.de/gnupgkey/mansfeld.asc Fingerprint: 6563 057D E6B8 9105 1CE4 18D0 4056 1F54 8B59 40EF _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
