Hello, maybe someone has similar effects or can give me a hint where
to look. If not, it's OK...
Windows 7 pro(64), GPGRelay 9.962 (a POP3/SMTP "proxy" or better
local relay for GnuPG), GnuPG 1.4.18, Pegasus Mail 4.72de
Based on something strange on my computer (blocked memory etc. up to
explo
Teemu Likonen:
> Peter Lebbing [2016-12-08 18:12:50+01] wrote:
>
>> I forked the Debian git repo for GnuPG 2.1 [1], and had a go at what
>> was primarily the reversal of the changes introduced by 2.1.11-7+exp1.
>> You can find the result at GitLab at [2].
>
> Thanks. I'm not brave enough to try
Peter Lebbing [2016-12-08 18:12:50+01] wrote:
> I forked the Debian git repo for GnuPG 2.1 [1], and had a go at what
> was primarily the reversal of the changes introduced by 2.1.11-7+exp1.
> You can find the result at GitLab at [2].
Thanks. I'm not brave enough to try it yet. I wonder what is th
Peter Lebbing:
> On 08/12/16 14:14, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> Just some meditations:
>>
>> So, the late attendees can see and hear that the ordinary participants
>> confirm the checksum and that their fingerprints check out?
>
> Yes, the late attendees definitely need to be there at the beginning
Hello dkg and list!
Let me start out by thanking Daniel Kahn Gillmor for all his work on GnuPG and
its Debian packages. And also thanks to all the other devs!
I'd like to use the latest GnuPG 2.1 on my Debian jessie machines. When the
Debian package went from version 2.1.11-7 to 2.1.11-7+exp1, it
Le 2016-12-09 à 00:25, Peter Lebbing a écrit :
> Yes, the late attendees definitely need to be there at the beginning of the
> party, verifying that the SHA256 checksum printed at the top of their scrubbed
> list is the one being read aloud and hearing everybody confirm their
> fingerprint
> is co
Le 2016-12-08 à 22:05, Peter Lebbing a écrit :
> Stephan and Lachlan, thank you for thinking about this! I need to make a
> decision soon, I really need feedback!
Not a problem, efficient keysigning is something I've been pondering for
a while, so I'm really glad to see people working in the area.
On 08/12/16 14:14, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Just some meditations:
>
> So, the late attendees can see and hear that the ordinary participants
> confirm the checksum and that their fingerprints check out?
Yes, the late attendees definitely need to be there at the beginning of the
party, verifying th
Peter Lebbing:
> Stephan and Lachlan, thank you for thinking about this! I need to make a
> decision soon, I really need feedback!
>
> On 07/12/16 22:44, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> Doesn't your proposal imply that late attendees could
>> make their way through all the keysigning without fingerprint
Hi,
Lachlan Gunn:
> Le 2016-12-08 à 08:14, Stephan Beck a écrit :
>> Doesn't your proposal imply that late attendees could
>> make their way through all the keysigning without fingerprint
>> verification? Or do I miss something?
>
> If I understand correctly, the late attendees still get a copy o
Stephan and Lachlan, thank you for thinking about this! I need to make a
decision soon, I really need feedback!
On 07/12/16 22:44, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Doesn't your proposal imply that late attendees could
> make their way through all the keysigning without fingerprint
> verification? Or do I mis
On 08/12/16 07:29, Lachlan Gunn wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the late attendees still get a copy of the
> fingerprints after the fact, they just don't have it on their sheet of
> paper. The fingerprint-less piece of paper just lets them keep a record
> of who they have verified, and gives t
Le 2016-12-08 à 08:14, Stephan Beck a écrit :
> Doesn't your proposal imply that late attendees could
> make their way through all the keysigning without fingerprint
> verification? Or do I miss something?
If I understand correctly, the late attendees still get a copy of the
fingerprints after the
13 matches
Mail list logo
