Teemu Likonen: > Peter Lebbing [2016-12-08 18:12:50+01] wrote: > >> I forked the Debian git repo for GnuPG 2.1 [1], and had a go at what >> was primarily the reversal of the changes introduced by 2.1.11-7+exp1. >> You can find the result at GitLab at [2]. > > Thanks. I'm not brave enough to try it yet. I wonder what is the status > of official backport. There's a Debian bug report about that: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822974
A few days ago, I successfully updated to 2.1.16 on my Debian Stretch installation, watching how gpg (1.4.20something) was being replaced with 2.1.16, so I don't see the real need for a forced coexistence of the two (or three) versions on Jessie. Maybe I'll cast a glance at it, though. Cheers Stephan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
