On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:17, dongsheng.s...@gmail.com said:
>
>> Yes, I build gnupg 2.1.7 for 32 bit and 64 bit Windows with the latest
>> libgcrypt and pinentry.
>
> Funny, 64 bit Windows is not supported by GnuPG.
>
It's really works, you can
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:44, marko.bauha...@mailbox.org said:
> As far as i know it is possible to upload a sub key via the id of the sub key
> ending with the exclamation mark `!`.
You may use this notation to force the use of this subkey. However, an
OpenPGP key(block) always consists of a prim
> You can either upload the whole public set or none of it, you can't or
> at least I know of no way of uploading only the public part of the sub keys.
As far as i know it is possible to upload a sub key via the id of the sub key
ending with the exclamation mark `!`.
I mean does it make sense to
On Friday, September 04, 2015 09:54:58 AM Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 04-09-2015 0:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Here's the question I really want people to answer: "At what point do we
> > tell people, 'no, that data format has been obsolete for twenty years,
> > we're not going to support it any m
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:54, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
> Never IMO. This attitude leads to data being lost forever because new
> software can't read it anymore while the cost of adding read-only
> support is small.
No, that is entirely wrong. The whole PGP-2 stuff has been removed and
thus mos
On 04-09-2015 0:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Here's the question I really want people to answer: "At what point do we
> tell people, 'no, that data format has been obsolete for twenty years,
> we're not going to support it any more, it's not even close to
> conforming to the RFCs we implement'?"
