On 04-09-2015 0:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Here's the question I really want people to answer: "At what point do we > tell people, 'no, that data format has been obsolete for twenty years, > we're not going to support it any more, it's not even close to > conforming to the RFCs we implement'?"
Never IMO. This attitude leads to data being lost forever because new software can't read it anymore while the cost of adding read-only support is small. > If you say "for as long as people have that traffic," then you've just > given GnuPG an open-ended commitment to supporting PGP 2.6 *forever*. Read-only, yes. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
