On 03/27/2015 09:36 PM, Bolesław Tokarski wrote:
> ssh-keygen *can* sign a public key with a smartcard. Using a PKCS#11 token.
> However, I see that the OpenPGP card does not natively talk PKCS#11, but
> there's some wrapper library. Am I really forced to use that? Would it work
> correctly or woul
> Any word on whether confidant mail will support the openpgp smart
cards (or
> yubikey, similar)? -Nick
With GPG 2.1, the gpg-agent handles all the passphrase prompting. I
don't see
why it would not work with a smartcard. Which one do you think I should
get to
test with? I have not played w
Am 27.03.2015 um 13:36 schrieb Bolesław Tokarski:
> Hello,
[...]
> Is the PKCS#11 library for OpenPGP card usable?
I guess you may install and use gnupg-pkcs11-scd for that purpose, provided that
you only use RSA keys.
See /usr/share/man/man1/gnupg-pkcs11-scd.1 for more info.
Hope that helps
On 28/03/15 11:48, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:07, j...@jcea.es said:
>
>> My problem is that any change to the pubring, like downloading a new
>> key, refreshing, adding a new local signature with "--lsign", etc., will
>> force a trustdb update (in the next execution. For instance
I just followed the instructions on [1] for converting your pubring.gpg to the
new keybox format. I discovered I needed --import-options import-local-sigs on
the import command to also import my local signatures, which obviously is very
desirable when converting your public keyring... it's a bit lo
Any word on whether confidant mail will support the openpgp smart cards (or
yubikey, similar)?
-Nick
On Mar 29, 2015 7:55 AM, "MFPA" <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On Saturday 28 March 2015 at 6:05:05 PM, in
> , Peter Le
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:58, dougb@dougbarton.email said:
> Just out of curiosity, do you have an ETA on a new release?
Nothing really important has changed since mid February except for a fix
in gpgtar - does anyone really use it on non-Windows? (it has been
fixed in gpg4win).
Salam-Shalom,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 28 March 2015 at 6:05:05 PM, in
, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> No, but nobody said the adjective was used
> tautological.
Maybe it doesn't imply or hint that to everybody, but it is definitely
what I infer when I read "from strictly busine
