-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Saturday 28 March 2015 at 6:05:05 PM, in <mid:5516df41.4090...@digitalbrains.com>, Peter Lebbing wrote: > No, but nobody said the adjective was used > tautological. Maybe it doesn't imply or hint that to everybody, but it is definitely what I infer when I read "from strictly business to the dodgy darknet variety". > It's like someone says "they're doing shady business in > a dark alley" and you protest "Hey, I know plenty > proper businesses that are just upstanding people > making sales! In fact, I also know plenty alleys that > let in a lot of sunlight..." I think that's rather over-egging it. Wouldn't the equivalent protest be about the possible insinuation (and cliche) that all business that takes place in a dark alley is shady? (-; - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> Don't learn safety rules by accident... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVF+fhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwGYIH+wduMMfpLdqVyfr83Vm8MJ1V kbvKCaxWaIDu8iMFieIJo64gOitZBD4o/KWCISCwO7ADpzGmlrqwBcSjlYJSIw2f I07IC8rM09Wab6jOqbDJCFgJASCVjl2NpAKhzaHO2GKeZjS9hbVA/ZsHACD4PNC4 AMKk/6eqbS4SLe7ULAU/b9jfkSRD3dNghzcSQkUu9bs2rzetTGcTz2aozmT0fOcy LfR/nL+4i8JtbmaUbZ7W6jku8YXrknN9zAYih++NcWhT3+jaGjAV9BP/W7UUIjRh PCXQo2LS5BqQjHjDYnUgcKUZjfHMPPOs+zY3HHotte1hUYTgFme2FHFTHQWi4iWI vgQBFgoAZgUCVRfn7F8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45L80AQAHEDUcF6JJ7keNR3xhXo3jvavb m/V3oDUsTHHotmPbjgEAq/6BWQ2cw1NtdA2OPdpISJo0A0sQD2GvKjng7ZGCbAE= =RUbH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users