On 10/06/2012 15:03, Sam Smith wrote:
> I wasn't going to say anything, but I had no idea what Mr. Koch was
> talking about with that "finger" stuff. I studied his email and the
> email header looking for clues. Couldn't decipher what he meant.
>
>> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 10:28:04 +0100
>> From: ma
da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> Most people are normal users of pgp - I suspect there are few secret
> government agents - not that they are likely to say so :)
> though some believe them to be everywhere.
Secret agents may or may not be here. Actual operatives one doesn't know if
the
On 06/10/2012 11:25 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Please consider using clear signatures instead of conventional
> signatures.
My apologies: you're sending it with Base64 encoding instead of as
text/plain. With that correction my comment still applies: it's much
harder for those viewing the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David --
Please consider using clear signatures instead of conventional
signatures. If someone looks in the list archives they'll see a huge
opaque blob of text they can't read. Likewise if someone tries to
read your email on a system that doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/12 14:59, Sam Smith wrote:
>
> Okay. So please let me know if I understand correctly what I am supposed to
> do (or what you guys are recommending be done) with key signing:
>
> I downloaded the GnuPG program and ran gpg --verify. I am told
On 06/10/2012 10:36 AM, Sam Smith wrote:
> Mr. Koch, can you (or anyone else) recommend a book...
Michael W. Lucas, "PGP & GPG: Email for the Practical Paranoid," No
Starch Press, 2006.
http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-9781593270711-0
http://www.amazon.com/PGP-GPG-Email-Practical-Paranoid/dp/1593
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:36, smick...@hotmail.com said:
> Mr. Koch, can you (or anyone else) recommend a book that is good for
> novices like myself that covers GPG public keys and can help me learn
> how to verify identity based on the chain of trust (self-signatures
> and other signatures as you s
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:03, smick...@hotmail.com said:
> I wasn't going to say anything, but I had no idea what Mr. Koch was
> talking about with that "finger" stuff. I studied his email and the
> email header looking for clues. Couldn't decipher what he meant.
I am sorry about this. Most of the t
Mr. Koch, can you (or anyone else) recommend a book that is good for novices
like myself that covers GPG public keys and can help me learn how to verify
identity based on the chain of trust (self-signatures and other signatures as
you said in your email ) and covers other aspects of how GPG wor
I have to agree with Peter. I mean, everyone has to trust someone/something at
some point. I mean you trust Windows OS or your Linux Distro that it is not
doing bad things. It is calling up all these APIs etc. Have your verified
everything your OS does? Have your verified every signing key used
I wasn't going to say anything, but I had no idea what Mr. Koch was talking
about with that "finger" stuff. I studied his email and the email header
looking for clues. Couldn't decipher what he meant.
> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 10:28:04 +0100
> From: markr-gn...@signal100.com
> To: gnupg-users@gnu
Okay. So please let me know if I understand correctly what I am supposed to do
(or what you guys are recommending be done) with key signing:
I downloaded the GnuPG program and ran gpg --verify. I am told the keyID that
signed the program. I download that KeyID from a keyserver. I now ask people
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:28, markr-gn...@signal100.com said:
> Do you know of any common modern browsers that have finger protocol
> support built in? I wonder, how many people even have a finger client
Indeed they must have dropped finger recently. I don't known when I
checked the last time, but
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:35, jw72...@verizon.net said:
> When I installed Gpg4win, it came with GnuPG v2.0.17. I am not sure
> when it will be updated to include v2.0.19, but I was wondering
The new beta has 2.0.19.
> whether there would be any problem from substituting the new version
> of gpgv2.e
On 09/06/12 22:55, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I apologize for not understanding sooner
There's no need for that :)
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente
15 matches
Mail list logo
