On 05/25/2012 06:43 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> I gave you an example which was Seahorse - clearly you failed to
> read.
You did not specify which distro was refusing to give the source for
Seahorse. I've found it in the repositories for Ubuntu, Debian and Fedora.
> I have set out quite clear
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 09:24:32AM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
...snip..
>
> At this point you look skywards and scream, "GET ME OUT OF THIS
> METAPHOR! I get it already! A nonconstructive proof doesn't tell us
> anything about /what/ or /why/ or /how/, it just says that some
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/24/12 7:56 PM, reynt0 wrote:
. . .
The idea is just to maximize usability to maximum audience,
. . .
"Maximum audience" is not the same as "maximum usability." The two are
different properties. When it comes to the written word, ease of
r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 23:01, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:07:54PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Openpgp/enigmail does not support gpg2 unless one has installed gpg
>> 1.4.11 - but I no longer trust Openpgp/enigmail to do anything.
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 21:47, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> For example opensuse - all versions tested:
>
>> (1) When you open the address book in TB select an address right
>> mouse click you get an option to create a
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:07:54PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Openpgp/enigmail does not support gpg2 unless one has installed gpg
> 1.4.11 - but I no longer trust Openpgp/enigmail to do anything.
That's unfortunate. While I'm mostly a Mutt user these days, I have Debian
Icedove installed wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> For example opensuse - all versions tested:
>
> (1) When you open the address book in TB select an address right
> mouse click you get an option to create a per-recipient rule for
> that person. (Openpg
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:31, mw...@iupui.edu said:
> And life is too short to go trawling the Internet for X Compose
> sequences. If I could find a comprehensive table I'd probably use
Meanwhile I set my keyboard to:
| mod3+ | normal | shift |
|---++|
| P | „ |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 14:03, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:59PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> - From tests carried out - Mandrava Linux was ok. I suspect that other Linux
>> distros have no
>> real problems - just because your works -
On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:25, bd9...@att.com said:
> I don't get as much info returned as you guys but that's probably because I
> Have an "old" gpg version on my system (1.4.11):
That is not very old. 1.4 is fully maintained in addition to 2.x.
> gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 1B8A6A37
> gpg:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 25.05.2012 16:39, DUELL, BOB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Couple quick questions (and probably a FAQ):
>
> 1. Attempting to decrypt a file that was sent to me by someone
> else, I get this message:
>
> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 24.05.2012 20:09, Jose Juan Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good morning I try to encrypt a file ,similar to the step 3 on this
> page:
>
> http://developer.gooddata.com/docs/sso
>
> with the next instruction:
>
> gpg --armor --output enc.txt --
Thanks (and Hauke as well). This just confirms my suspicion.
I don't get as much info returned as you guys but that's probably because I
Have an "old" gpg version on my system (1.4.11):
bd9439@dspsas01 $ gpg --list-packets < optout_050912.zip.gpg
gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
gpg: please
>> There's a slight confusion in these answers that I think it would be
>> really helpful to address in an FAQ.
>
> Yes, there is. Unfortunately, the answer is kind of messy.
[ snip ]
Thank you for a really good and useful answer. I hope some of that
can make it into the FAQ.
If I understand y
Am Fr 25.05.2012, 13:39:27 schrieb DUELL, BOB:
> Hi,
>
> Couple quick questions (and probably a FAQ):
You need the link to the FAQ?
http://www.gnupg.org/documentation/faqs.en.html
> 1. Attempting to decrypt a file that was sent to me by someone else,
> I get this message:
>
> gpg: de
On 05/25/2012 09:39 AM, DUELL, BOB wrote:
> 1. Attempting to decrypt a file that was sent to me by someone else,
> I get this message:
>
> gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
>
> Could that mean the file was not encrypted with my public key?
yes, that is one plausible
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on
Fri May 25 15:24:32 CEST 2012 :
> In reality, Dan Boneh is a very nice guy, quite reasonable, and
nothing at all like I'm portraying him here.
He gives a free online crypto course at Stanford
https://www.coursera.org/#course/crypto
The cour
Hi,
Couple quick questions (and probably a FAQ):
1. Attempting to decrypt a file that was sent to me by someone else,
I get this message:
gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available
Could that mean the file was not encrypted with my public key?
2. Assuming the above it "yes
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:44:40AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:22, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
>
> > The final version that gets submitted to Werner will by necessity be
> > plain text, and that will probably get downshifted into dumb typewriter
>
> Keep those quotes. I lik
On 5/25/12 8:35 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Dan Boneh showed breaking RSA without factoring anything was
> probably possible, but it was a nonconstructive demonstration -- we have
> no idea where to begin.
Just realized the phrase "nonconstructive" may need to be explained.
The best way to do it
On Friday 25 of May 2012 11:22:45 Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 25-05-2012 4:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > product they offer:
> > * Diffie-Hellman
> > * DSA (1024-bit keys only)
> > * RSA (up to 4096-bit keys)
>
> Seems they want to push everyone to RSA. I wonder why? The patent issue
>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:27:59PM +0100, michael crane wrote:
> >> mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg*
Sorry, that's lingering evidence of my VMS habits:
mwood@mhw ~ $ alias dir
alias dir='ls -l'
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Asking whether markets are efficient is like
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:59PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> - From tests carried out - Mandrava Linux was ok. I suspect that other Linux
> distros have no
> real problems - just because your works - does not mean that every other
> Linux distro works.
However: because it works on my syst
On 5/25/12 6:41 AM, Nicholas Cole wrote:
> ***In terms of current scientific understandings, the symmetric
> ciphers used in GnuPG are utterly***
> The symmetric ciphers used in GnuPG are utterly immune to
> brute forcing. The Second Law of Thermodynamics places strict
I'm comfortable with things
> ---re #5: Is RSA-2048 really enough?
>
> ***start 2nd sentence : And other organizations to whom encryption
> is important (such as RSA...*** [The world changes, and maybe
> an explicit endorsement might not be so appropriate tomorrow,
> but embarassing or similar to change then. Just mentioni
On 25-05-2012 4:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Looking over the PGP product offerings after their acquisition by
> Symantec, it seems they have dropped support for 2048- and 3072-bit DSA.
> This decision makes no sense to me, and is sufficiently weird that I
> wonder if the marketing copy is horri
On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:22, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> The final version that gets submitted to Werner will by necessity be
> plain text, and that will probably get downshifted into dumb typewriter
Keep those quotes. I like UTF-8 and it is always easier to replace them
by ticks and backticks th
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:09, gonzale...@hildebrando.com said:
> but when I use this, the gpg send me a message:
I can't see that but I guess that you want to use this command line:
gpg --armor --output enc.txt --encrypt --recipient secur...@gooddata.com
--trust-model always --batch --yes sig
On Thu, 24 May 2012 21:27, mick.cr...@gmail.com said:
>>> mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg*
10.2 `dir': Briefly list directory contents
===
`dir' is equivalent to `ls -C -b'; that is, by default files are listed
in columns, sorted vertically, and special char
29 matches
Mail list logo
