> Consider these two formats:-
>
> (A) Signature made 06/17/11 23:21:17
>
> (B) Signature made 06/17/11
>
> A signature that contained only the information for (B) would reveal
> less about the signer's behaviour than a signature containing the
> information for (A).
>
> Whether that's po
>>> if you cheat your employer out of their money,
>
>
> The scenario stated that a fluctuating work volume resulted in periods
> when there was no work to do. Using that time for your own purposes
> does not look to me like cheating your employer.
In that case you have nothing to fear from your t
>> ..., or runs timestamping
>> in batches, etc.
(snip)
> Excuse the pedantry but how do we get "between 10:00 and 11:00"
> reliably from a clock that regularly drifts up to 10 minutes?
--
Jerome Baum
tel +49-1578-8434336
email jer...@jeromebaum.com
web www.jeromebaum.com
--
PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 17 June 2011 at 11:21:12 PM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
> To me that is quite clear not a problem of the FORMAT
> of the timestamp.
Consider these two formats:-
(A) Signature made 06/17/11 23:21:17
(B) Signature made 06/1
Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2011, 23:23:34 schrieb MFPA:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 3:27:12 PM, in
> , Hauke Laging
>
> wrote:
> > If anyone is not happy with the OpenPGP timestamp
> > format (which I haven't noticed yet)
>
> Then I refer you to two postings from Amano Corunga
> Message-id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 3:27:12 PM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
> If anyone is not happy with the OpenPGP timestamp
> format (which I haven't noticed yet)
Then I refer you to two postings from Amano Corunga
Message-id <20110608153652.4f1508c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 7:53:34 PM, in
, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> ??? When i make a signature with a timestamp in it, i
> am very much making (and intending to make) the
> assertion that the signature was made at that time. I
> see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 2:08:52 AM, in
, Jerome Baum
wrote:
>> if you cheat your employer out of their money,
The scenario stated that a fluctuating work volume resulted in periods
when there was no work to do. Using that time for your o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 6:37:02 PM, in
, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Timestamps *are* meaningful -- they are an assertion by
> the person making the signature of what time they made
> the signature.
In some cases the person making the si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 6:32:34 AM, in
, Jerome Baum
wrote:
> As for the error/resolution notation, someone else
> (can't recall who and the gmail thread is unbearable)
> mentioned that this would be relevant, and with the
> same breath th
On 17 June 2011 16:12, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 08:59, Werner Koch wrote:
>>> However, I have just managed to pick up a Gemalto pcmcia card reader
>>> (lenovo part # 41N3004) so I can give that a try instead, as soon as
>>
>> Please let me know - I have one here but never tested
On 19 May 2011 08:59, Werner Koch wrote:
>> However, I have just managed to pick up a Gemalto pcmcia card reader
>> (lenovo part # 41N3004) so I can give that a try instead, as soon as
>
> Please let me know - I have one here but never tested it.
Hi Werner,
I installed Debian i386 6.0.1 on my Thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
