Re: [OT] passphrases Was: Re: Allowing paste into pinentry-gtk-2?

2011-04-16 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> While I'm not disputing that you've created a reasonably strong > passphrase, my original point was that any passphrase that isn't fully > random has a reduced keyspace. I'm not enough of a mathemagician to > say how much it's reduced, but it's certainly reduced by a non-zero > amount. The best

Re: [OT] passphrases Was: Re: Allowing paste into pinentry-gtk-2?

2011-04-16 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Mine, for instance, is over 30 characters long and, while it is derived > from a couple of phrases, none of its components would be found by any > reasonable brute-force or even dictionary attack, even by people who > know me (please note t

[OT] passphrases Was: Re: Allowing paste into pinentry-gtk-2?

2011-04-16 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:47:34PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > Currently, it looks like pinentry-gtk-2 (I'm using 0.8.0) doesn't allow > pasting from the clipboard. This is annoying, because a truly long, > randomized password is not practical to type into a hidden dialog box. It > really seems

Re: Allowing paste into pinentry-gtk-2?

2011-04-16 Thread Anthony Papillion
I don't have an answer to your question, Todd, but I have to second your frustration with not being able to paste to the pinentry. I've never really seen a good justification as to why paste has been disallowed either so I'd love to see it implemented. Anthony On 4/16/11, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:

Re: public key not found, but it is there!

2011-04-16 Thread Paul Richard Ramer
On 4/14/11 5:02 PM, Felipe Alvarez wrote: > now, whenever I try to encrypt to user "alice" It fails, saying > encryption failed: public key not found > > The public key is there! But it has a different fingerprint > (17D11744). GPG is looking for Alice's Old hash fingerprint > (DE0155B3). How