On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 09:22 PM, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net wrote:
>> If you have your public key published somewhere, such as on a key
>> server, the Key ID is a way for other people to unambiguously look up
>> the full key.
>
> You're qui
On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 2/15/11 11:35 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Long-form keyIDs (of the form 0xDECAFBADDEADBEEF) are significantly
>> harder to spoof, but easily within reach of a well-funded organization.
>
> IIRC, Jon Callas says an accidental long-ID
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:02:43AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Jason Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:50:11PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> > Geez, doesn't anybody READ anymore?! Even _I_ just managed to read:
> > So, it is in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH quoted abov
On 2/15/11 11:25 PM, Jason Harris wrote:
> Geez, doesn't anybody READ anymore?! Even _I_ just managed to read:
Some of us read quite well: others less so.
David was responding to the information he had available. The message
you're quoting was sent *after* David sent his.
> So, it is in the LD
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:50:11PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> > I have set the
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib/64:/usr/lib/64
> >
> > But when i run this command:
> > gpg --list-keys
> > i am getting this error:
> >
> > ld.so.1: gpg: fatal: libusb.so.1: open fa
On 02/16/2011 12:02 AM, David Shaw wrote:
>
> In future I will always ensure to use my time machine when replying, since
> clearly people replying to a message from 4:26 should know the information
> revealed in a completely different message from one hour later at 5:25.
>
> Really, it's just a
Thanks david.. it got worked.. gr8
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Jason Harris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:50:11PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> >>> I have set the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib/64
On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:50:11PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>>> I have set the
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib/64:/usr/lib/64
>>>
>>> But when i run this command:
>>> gpg --list-keys
>>> i am getting this erro
On 2/15/11 11:35 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Long-form keyIDs (of the form 0xDECAFBADDEADBEEF) are significantly
> harder to spoof, but easily within reach of a well-funded organization.
IIRC, Jon Callas says an accidental long-ID collision has occurred. I
don't recall the details. Still, t
On 02/15/2011 09:22 PM, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net wrote:
> If you have your public key published somewhere, such as on a key
> server, the Key ID is a way for other people to unambiguously look up
> the full key.
You're quite correct that the key ID provides a handle that references
the ac
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:38:47AM -0800 Also sprach AgoristTeen1994:
>
> Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand
> that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is
> just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason I"m asking is
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:16 PM, hare krishna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone help me out why i am facing this problem.
> OS - Unix.
>
> I have set the
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib/64:/usr/lib/64
>
> But when i run this command:
> gpg --list-keys
> i am getting thi
On 2/15/11 5:40 PM, hare krishna wrote:
>(a) What OS are you running? - UNIX
Once again, there is no "UNIX" operating system. There are many
different vendors who provide operating systems that conform to varying
levels of the UNIX specifications. For instance, my Macbook Pro
conforms to the
(a) What OS are you running? - UNIX
(b) Which version? - platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490
(c) From where did you acquire GnuPG? i dont remember exactly
(d) Where is GnuPG located? - /opt/app/test1/gpg/gpg1.4.9/bin/gpg
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
On 2/15/11 5:25 PM, hare krishna wrote:
> This is the output of ldd /gpg/gpg1.4.9/bin/gpg
Which does not answer any of my four questions, and does not help me
solve your problem.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/
This is the output of ldd /gpg/gpg1.4.9/bin/gpg
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
libbz2.so.1 => /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
libusb.so.1 => /usr/sfw/lib/libusb.so.1
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
libmp
On 2/15/11 4:16 PM, hare krishna wrote:
> Can someone help me out why i am facing this problem.
> OS - Unix.
There is no "UNIX" operating system. I am guessing that you're running
some version of x86_64 Solaris, but am uncertain of this. We'll have a
much easier time helping if you answer these
El Tue, 15-02-2011 a las 15:15 -0500, Jerry escribió:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:11:24 +0100
> Hans Alves articulated:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I noticed that when I use a symetric cipher, the default algorithm is
> > CAST5 which allways gives me this warning when decrypting:
> > gpg: WARNING: message
Hi,
Can someone help me out why i am facing this problem.
OS - Unix.
I have set the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib/64:/usr/lib/64
But when i run this command:
gpg --list-keys
i am getting this error:
*ld.so.1: gpg: fatal: libusb.so.1: open failed: No such file or
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:11:24 +0100
Hans Alves articulated:
> Hey,
>
> I noticed that when I use a symetric cipher, the default algorithm is
> CAST5 which allways gives me this warning when decrypting:
> gpg: WARNING: message was not integrity protected
> So, is there a way to change the default
Hey,
I noticed that when I use a symetric cipher, the default algorithm is
CAST5 which allways gives me this warning when decrypting:
gpg: WARNING: message was not integrity protected
So, is there a way to change the default algorithm to AES or TWOFISH
without having to specify it as a command-li
Just my idea. I tried to understand the dispatcher code and keyring.c
Werner was referring to, but I would not know how to implement it.
Save each chunk as a seperate relational tuple?
By the way: Because of database design, even SQLite would probably be
faster for reading, but not for writing. Bu
On 02/14/2011 09:59 AM, M. Henry wrote:
> Now, when I use gpg to look up a key by any part of a uid (for example when
> using --edit-
> key), it automatically selects the first-created _revoked_ key, not the sole
> non-revoked one. I
> have tried revoking and deleting specific uids from the revo
On 2/15/11 8:38 AM, AgoristTeen1994 wrote:
>
> Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand
> that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is
> just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason I"m asking is that if
> I want to give m
Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand
that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is
just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason I"m asking is that if
I want to give my public key to someone, then I apparently give the e
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> I won't promise anything, though.
>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
> Werner
>
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
Would there be a way to have gpg use a database for keys without
Forgive me if this is a terribly common problem/issue, but I've had a lengthy
search both of
this list and the web generally (as well as trawling at great length through
the GPG man) and
have found nothing on it.
Being a recent convert to PGP/GPG I have been playing around a bit to get used
t
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:01, pat...@debian.org said:
> I've got 2 readers:
> OmniKey CardMan 3121 (USB device)
> OmniKey CardMan 4040 (PCMCIA device)
All Omnikey based readers don't work with 2k keys. There is a hack in
scdaemon which sometimes helps, but in general they are not supported;
neither
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:41, k...@grant-olson.net said:
> Thirdly, the SCUTE docs start by generating a certificate request from
> your OpenPGP authentication key. In this scenario, are you just using
> the Same RSA key for both your OpenPGP and X509 certificates? Does the
Yes, it is possible to
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:41, k...@grant-olson.net said:
> Firstly, can I actually import a certificate like this onto the card?
> Or do I simply misunderstand the specs?
Yes.
> Secondly, is there a command somewhere in gpg/gpgsm/gpg* to do this, or
> is it specified and implemented on the OpenPGP
Hi,
thanks for explaining the project. I looked at your packes and found no
reason not to include it. In particular the quick links to the license
files were helpful for checking that this is indeed all about free
software.
I added GPGTools to the related software section and also featured it o
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:52, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> Do you expect that we'll be able to run with auto-check-trustdb once you
> make the transition to keybox?
It should be much faster. I won't promise anything, though.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regel
32 matches
Mail list logo
