On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:02:43AM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Jason Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:50:11PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:

> > Geez, doesn't anybody READ anymore?!  Even _I_ just managed to read:

> > So, it is in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH quoted above, and therefore
> > IT IS ON THE SYSTEM, right?
> 
> In future I will always ensure to use my time machine when replying, since 
> clearly people replying to a message from 4:26 should know the information 
> revealed in a completely different message from one hour later at 5:25.
> 
> Really, it's just a shame we don't all have your amazing skills for reading 
> messages that haven't been sent yet.

More likely the problem was in receiving.  The ldd output message
was delivered to me at Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:30:42 -0500.  Your reply
to the OP's 1st, thread-starting message
was delivered to me at Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:23:49 -0500.
Your reply's Date: was Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:50:11 -0500.  So, the ldd
output was available, at least to me, for almost 20 minutes before 
you hit send.  If you received:

  Message-ID: <AANLkTimraUm47ZB9Hzn=sn-7o1aafpemy_qiy1fo4...@mail.gmail.com>

significantly later, fine, but there is no need to inject absurdities.

-- 
Jason Harris           |  PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jhar...@widomaker.com _|_ Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004

Attachment: pgpqs58AQUtfw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to