Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El 07-08-2010 15:59, Paul Richard Ramer escribió: ... > So for me that makes approximately 1 in 29 encrypted messages was not > encrypted to my key, 1 in 19 of all messages was a NETMK message, and 1 > in 12 of all messages was either not encrypted to

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Richard Ramer
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:57:57 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > It is also worth noting that PGPNET has some very big problems with key > management. PGPNET users are apparently comfortable wrestling with > these problems (more power to them for that), but we shouldn't pretend > the problems don't e

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote: > Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised *nobody* > was interested. One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was negative. These things happen. Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't the tool they want. :) > I take

Re: Keypair is expiring.

2010-08-07 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Friday 6 August 2010 at 3:07:31 PM, in , Klaus Vink Slott wrote: > I > find it quite confusing that if you start the program > with --edit-key [subkey-id] and issue a expire command > - then I am offered to extend the life of the primary > k

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 5 August 2010 at 11:32:37 PM, in , Robert J. Hansen wrote: > So the question isn't whether key management is the > major reason why people sign up and don't hang around > -- the question is more whether key management is a > major e

Re: Keypair is expiring.

2010-08-07 Thread Faramir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El 06-08-2010 10:07, Klaus Vink Slott escribió: ... > offered to extend the life of the primary key. This let me to the conclusion > that is was not possible to extend the validity on a subkey. My fault and now > every thing is great for the next 5 y

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 03:51, Snaky Love wrote: > Hi, > I would like to better understand: is gnupg good for big groups? > > I would like to encrypt communication in groups - not instant communication > like e.g. messengers like pidgin, but like on a forum or web-group - the > data persists in an

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

2010-08-07 Thread Vlad "SATtva" Miller
David Smith (06.08.2010 19:51): > Note that there are no solutions that will prevent a user keeping a > decrypted copy of a previously-downloaded document, unless you use your > own custom-written browser and document viewer. How's that? A DRM? Don't forget a custom OS and a custom monitor to prev

batch program to find my password - help please!!!

2010-08-07 Thread wegwerf4
Unfortunately I forgot my passphrase but can remember some characters and the position of them in the phrase. I wrote a bash-script to check a list of passwords which are all candidates. I also created a test-gpg-account to test the script before I run it with the quite longer list. Now the o