-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 07-08-2010 15:59, Paul Richard Ramer escribió:
...
> So for me that makes approximately 1 in 29 encrypted messages was not
> encrypted to my key, 1 in 19 of all messages was a NETMK message, and 1
> in 12 of all messages was either not encrypted to
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:57:57 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> It is also worth noting that PGPNET has some very big problems with key
> management. PGPNET users are apparently comfortable wrestling with
> these problems (more power to them for that), but we shouldn't pretend
> the problems don't e
On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised *nobody*
> was interested.
One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was negative.
These things happen. Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't
the tool they want. :)
> I take
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 6 August 2010 at 3:07:31 PM, in
, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
> I
> find it quite confusing that if you start the program
> with --edit-key [subkey-id] and issue a expire command
> - then I am offered to extend the life of the primary
> k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 5 August 2010 at 11:32:37 PM, in
, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> So the question isn't whether key management is the
> major reason why people sign up and don't hang around
> -- the question is more whether key management is a
> major e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El 06-08-2010 10:07, Klaus Vink Slott escribió:
...
> offered to extend the life of the primary key. This let me to the conclusion
> that is was not possible to extend the validity on a subkey. My fault and now
> every thing is great for the next 5 y
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 03:51, Snaky Love wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to better understand: is gnupg good for big groups?
>
> I would like to encrypt communication in groups - not instant communication
> like e.g. messengers like pidgin, but like on a forum or web-group - the
> data persists in an
David Smith (06.08.2010 19:51):
> Note that there are no solutions that will prevent a user keeping a
> decrypted copy of a previously-downloaded document, unless you use your
> own custom-written browser and document viewer.
How's that? A DRM? Don't forget a custom OS and a custom monitor to
prev
Unfortunately I forgot my passphrase but can remember some
characters and the position of them in the phrase.
I wrote a bash-script to check a list of passwords which
are all candidates.
I also created a test-gpg-account to test the script before
I run it with the quite longer list.
Now the o