On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote: > Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised *nobody* > was interested.
One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was negative. These things happen. Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't the tool they want. :) > I take it the "spam overhead problem" you refer to is things like "not > encrypted to my key" messages? Yep.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
