On 06/18/10 12:42, David Shaw wrote:
The danger here is that it might take a long time (minutes+) to realize that
the keyserver and/or network wasn't going to cooperate. This could seriously
slow down many GPG operations.
I've been following this discussion with interest as I've seen proble
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on
Fri Jun 18 14:13:56 CEST 2010 :
>> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple
>signatures for a
>> file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one
>command (so
>> not by signing a signed file...).
>
>
>gpg --armor -u sign
On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
> On Monday 14 June 2010 at 5:50:32 PM, in
> , Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>
>> Network or keyserver failures during an auto-refresh
>> should be accepted and the rest of the operation should
>> continue (though the last-refreshed time shouldn't be
>> up
On 05/03/2010 10:17 AM, Joke de Buhr wrote:
> I'm using Ubuntu lucid (amd64) with firefox 3.6.3.
>
> On Monday 03 May 2010 15:49:35 Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 May 2010 12:22, j...@seiken.de said:
>>> selecting my key I always get this firefox error message
>>> "sec_error_pkcs11_function_fail
On Jun 14, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/04/2010 01:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote:
>> It seems like the best solution would be to build into gnupg the
>> functionality
>> that is similar to the automatic trust database operation: have gpg
>> auto-refresh
>> from the configu
Hi there,
for a Test i installed GPG on MacOsX 5.8,
so far so good, works fine, thank you Guys btw. for that nice Work.
But now i hang there and im not able to uninstall the hole thing.
Can someone tell me a workthrough, cause im not so close to Procedures
that be probable neccessary to it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/06/2010 14:24, David Smith wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> David Smith wrote:
>>> Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the "Precedence: bulk"
>>> or "Precedence: junk" header, and then the autoresponder should
>>> recognise this
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Well, the stuff I get from the Gnupg-users@gnupg.org list has
> "precedence: list" set. Other lists to which I subscribe use "Precedence
> normal" or "precedence: bulk". Regular e-mail does not have precedence
> set at all. It seems to me that mailing lists should get the
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
> > file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
> > not by signing a signed file...).
>
> Sure.
>
> gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> David Smith wrote:
>> Mailing lists programs normally send mails with the "Precedence: bulk"
>> or "Precedence: junk" header, and then the autoresponder should
>> recognise this and choose not to respond to mails with the "bulk" or
>> "junk" precedence header. It is up to
David Smith wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, this is done by setting the precedence of the
>> vacation e-mail to "bulk" instead of something else ("list"?), and that
>> mailing list programs do not send the stuff marked bulk.
>>
>> Is that not how mailing list programs
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
> (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
> signing a signed file...).
Sure.
gpg -u signer_1 -u signer_2 -u signer_3 --detac
On 6/17/10 11:33 PM, Boris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a
> file (in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so
> not by signing a signed file...).
gpg --armor -u signer -u signer2 -u signer3 --clearsign filename
Wa
Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600
> I was just stating to a colleague that it had been months since an
> errant "vacation" message had been posted on this forum. Well, thanks
> to Bob, that drought has been quenched. With the summer season now
> upon us and vacations becoming the n
Hi group,
I am trying to include support for IDEA within GnuPG 2.0.9 running under
Linux. I have downloaded the idea.c module via the link on this page:
http://www.gnupg.org/faq/why-not-idea.html, have compiled it and have
added the
load-extension /idea
statement to my conf file in ~/.g
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:04:41 -0600
Richard Hamilton articulated:
> I am out of the office until 06/24/2010.
>
> I am out of the office until Thursday June 24th. If this is a
> production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336
> or email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com.
Hi,
I would like to know if there is a way to add multiple signatures for a file
(in a separate file) and check who signed with just one command (so not by
signing a signed file...).
Thanks,
Koushkov
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
h
Hello,
Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010 02:10:22 schrieb MFPA:
> I don't know how common or uncommon it might be. I just know that, of
> the keys in my keyring of about 400 keys, I have noticed more
> deviations away from my default keyserver to key.asc files than to
> alternate keyservers.
but this is a
18 matches
Mail list logo
