Howdy,
Working on updating gnupg in FreeBSD and ran into a problem. GnuPG
2.0.15 requires libassuan 2.0.0, but to build the gpgsm module it
requires dirmngr, which requires libassuan 1.x. My understanding is that
there is a dirmngr update planned
(http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:12:54 PM, in
, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> Hmm, I never read anywhere that this would be the
> etiquette of this group. It's certainly not mentioned
> on the listinfo page of gnupg-users. Also, most people
> seem to repl
>
> SPAM (in capital letters) is a canned precooked meat product made by
> the Hormel Foods Corporation. (-;
>
Which is pretty good when sliced thin, pan fried and put on a toasted
English muffin with spicy mustard!
___
Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas
so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 7:37:33 PM, in
, Jerry wrote:
> While it would appear that most users direct their
> replies back to the list, there are a few morons who
> feel it is their sworn duty to CC: the OP.
After my first few postings to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:01:34 PM, in
,
Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did
> I read it wrong seems a lot of people replied to
> theirs.
I refer you to Werner's later post, after people started re
Filippo Valsorda wrote the following on 6/13/10 12:34 PM:
> Hi, i created a keyring a couple of years ago without any serious
> intent. I kept my keys "not so secure".
>
> Now i want to restart, without changing ID, as i am always the same
> person, but revoking all from the past.
> What have I to
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:12:54 +0200
Ingo Klöcker articulated:
> Hmm, I never read anywhere that this would be the etiquette of this
> group. It's certainly not mentioned on the listinfo page of
> gnupg-users. Also, most people seem to reply to list only.
While it would appear that most users di
Hi, i created a keyring a couple of years ago without any serious
intent. I kept my keys "not so secure".
Now i want to restart, without changing ID, as i am always the same
person, but revoking all from the past.
What have I to do?
Thanks a lot
sec 1024D/01
On Sunday 13 June 2010, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in
> , Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to
> > dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore,
> > the mailing list software should not touch the Reply-to
> > header
I read it but didn't see that I had to do anything. Did I read it
wrong seems a lot of people replied to theirs.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> Interestingly enough, the first email I read this morning had a link to
> this:
>
>
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/06/12/2339209/Google-Tells-Congress-It-Disclosed-Wi-Fi-Sniffing
>
> And that is just the tip of the ice burg.
>
> --
> Jerry
OMG!! Google is stealing and archiving pictures of m
On 2010-06-11 09:38, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an
> automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The
> owner of the ticketing system at secure.mpcustomer.com does not
> respond to any of our queries to send us more i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in
, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to
> dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore,
> the mailing list software should not touch the Reply-to
> header.
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 13 June 2010, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>>> On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
Conversely, many MUAs support the "reply to list" function that
should work correctly on this list.
>> Perhaps so, but my Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 dies not,
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
> >> Conversely, many MUAs support the "reply to list" function that
> >> should work correctly on this list.
>
> Perhaps so, but my Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 dies not, and it is the
> lates
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
>>
>> Jean-David Beyer articulated:
>>> I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
>>> button and no others. There is no such button on that screen that
>>> allows diddling button
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:03:00 +0200
Ingo Klöcker articulated:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
> >
> > Jean-David Beyer articulated:
> > > I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
> > > button and no others. There is no such b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:58:19 -0500
Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas articulated:
> > I would not trust Google with your data, far less mine. They have
> > all ready been accused of illegally pilfering through user data and
> > mining for user wireless info
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400
>
> Jean-David Beyer articulated:
> > I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All
> > button and no others. There is no such button on that screen that
> > allows diddling buttons. Thunderbird 2.0.0.16,
19 matches
Mail list logo
