-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 6:12:54 PM, in <mid:201006131912.55...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de>, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Hmm, I never read anywhere that this would be the > etiquette of this group. It's certainly not mentioned > on the listinfo page of gnupg-users. Also, most people > seem to reply to list only. When I first posted here, I wondered why I kept getting copies of replies to my posts sent directly to my address as well as via the list. Soon, somebody corrected me for not copying them in on my reply to their post as well as sending it to the list. They told me that was the etiquette here. Since my experience at the time supported that statement, I duly set up my reply template to do just that. I can't remember who that was, and probably no longer have a copy of the message. I still often receive copies of replies to my posts directly as well as via the list; sometimes both addresses are in the "to" field, but more often one or other is a "cc." I still have my reply template set up to do the same. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com No man ever listened himself out of a job -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTBV2c6ipC46tDG5pAQpzmgP8CuvmihkXJiSBMNfjwENzEe4qaC2Ibxu1 mDHHOdefWk3HZ7zhvT3/M0BqCRBr32cpTS/aw7bSjpneZTKgSzUizAfBoP6wyEQN peRewNNUT/ena3A06E/627R5Zm1Ux9GO3nrF0iyJxFS5zUk9sbHjn6NDwGX0CF6+ P8PLRZ75pr0= =yGjw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
