Re: Test mail to gnupg.user

2010-06-12 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:40:28 -0400 Jean-David Beyer articulated: > I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All button > and no others. There is no such button on that screen that allows > diddling buttons. Thunderbird 2.0.0.16, which is the latest for Red > Hat Enterprise Lin

Re: Test mail to gnupg.user

2010-06-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/12/10 13:40, Jean-David Beyer wrote: I see no way to do that. I have a Reply button and a Reply All button and no others. There is no such button on that screen that allows diddling buttons. Thunderbird 2.0.0.16, which is the latest for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. As much as I hate to con

Re: Test mail to gnupg.user

2010-06-12 Thread Jean-David Beyer
Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas wrote: my e-mailer honored it automatically (perhaps it does). Because some lists to which I subscribe automatically reply to the lists, and some automatically reply to the original sender, and I cannot remember which is which. I know asking any particular list to chang

Re: Test mail to gnupg.user

2010-06-12 Thread Carl Spitzer
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 08:45 -0500, Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas wrote: > To handle this issue I added the "reply to list" button to Thunderbird. > Whenever I deal with a list, I hit that button. I added it through the > right click > customize menu and drug the button to my toolbar. > I use Evolut

Re: Test mail to cw...@keepandbeararms.com

2010-06-12 Thread Carl Spitzer
Aok here. Looks like your list is set correctly c-R goes to you and c-L to the list. On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:37 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > Hi! > > One of the subscribers to this list created a mail forward to an > automated ticketing system which responds to the the poster. The > owner of th

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Saturday 12 June 2010 at 12:37:08 PM, in , Jerry wrote: > I would not trust Google with your data, far less mine. The problem is that you never know if your contact will forward things to a google account... - -- Best regards MFPA

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Jean-David Beyer
Jerry wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:22:47 -0500 Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas articulated: I use gmail for my SMTP needs. I have accounts on a couple of unix machines, yahoo, gmail, aim, my business hosted via godaddy and I choose gmail as the default SMTP server for all of them. Works like a ch

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Jerry
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:39:00 -0400 Jean-David Beyer articulated: > Yes, I did. They will not accept anything from my MTA even when I use > the smarthost feature. I can use either their web site server (that I > detest) or Firefox, but they will not allow sendmail even with > smarthost. Please

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I would not trust Google with your data, far less mine. They have all > ready been accused of illegally pilfering through user data and mining > for user wireless information. I avoid them like the plague whenever > possible. Pffft, they can't get t

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:22:47 -0500 Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas articulated: > I use gmail for my SMTP needs. I have accounts on a couple of unix > machines, yahoo, gmail, aim, my business hosted via godaddy and I > choose gmail as the default SMTP se

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Sonja Michelle Lina Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I use gmail for my SMTP needs. I have accounts on a couple of unix machines, yahoo, gmail, aim, my business hosted via godaddy and I choose gmail as the default SMTP server for all of them. Works like a charm. http://lifehacker.com/66/how-to-use-g

Re: Keyserver spam example

2010-06-12 Thread Jean-David Beyer
MFPA wrote: The Spamhaus PBL might very well list you. 76.185.38.113 is listed in the PBL Mailservers using this blocklist would probably block mail from you. Of course, even Spamhaus's own website says the PBL is not a blacklist and that you can remove your IP address from their list i