-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw escribió:
...
> Incidentally, there have been proposals to add forward security
> extensions to OpenPGP. See http://www.apache-ssl.org/openpgp-pfs.txt
As a side note, I am not sure I like these proposals...
"Therefore when a public
On Aug 27, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
Would it be considered a best practice to rotate encryption subkeys
on an annual basis, or would that be considered overkill for most
uses?
It depends on what you're trying to do. :)
I realize that messages are encrypted using ephemer
On 08/27/2009 06:03 PM, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> Would it be considered a best practice to rotate encryption subkeys on
> an annual basis, or would that be considered overkill for most uses?
There almost certainly exist people for whom this is a good idea. That
said, I've never met 'em. It s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Would it be considered a best practice to rotate encryption subkeys on
an annual basis, or would that be considered overkill for most uses?
I realize that messages are encrypted using ephemeral session keys
which in turn are encrypted with pub
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:36:02PM +0200, Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> I changed my expiration with --edit-key expire from never to 3y and
> uploaded the key. Then I changed it to 5y and uploaded the key. Now the
> uploaded key has several self signatures and expiration dates on
> http://pgp.mit.edu:1
On 08/27/2009 03:30 PM, Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> Ok, great. Could I also sign my key after it expired with a new
> expiration period to revive it?
Yes, i'm pretty sure you can do this, but i always take pains to try to
update the expiration date *before* it passes ;)
--dkg
signature.as
On Thursday 27 August 2009, debianfeed wrote:
> Hello
>
> does anybody here know a possibility to use gpg key-groups under
> gnome? groups defined in the gpg.conf
> (e.g. "group mygroupname = 0x9DB0 0x9540")
> do not show up in nautilus' seahorse extension.
>
> kgpg is capable of dealing wi
Hi Berhnard--
On 08/27/2009 01:36 PM, Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> It appears the key expiration is part of the signatures. Will the most
> recent signature have the effective expiration date?
yes, the most recent certification made by the same issuer on a given
subject is considered to supercede all
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Berhnard--
>
> On 08/27/2009 01:36 PM, Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
>> It appears the key expiration is part of the signatures. Will the most
>> recent signature have the effective expiration date?
>
> yes, the most recent certification made by the same issuer on a given
Hi gnupg-users!
I changed my expiration with --edit-key expire from never to 3y and
uploaded the key. Then I changed it to 5y and uploaded the key. Now the
uploaded key has several self signatures and expiration dates on
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xF732FBF3E4219D48
Type
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:36 AM, John Betz wrote:
I appreciate the offer David, but I don't have PowerArchiver so I
can't
create a sample input file. The file I am trying to decrypt is
coming from
another source so I would have to get them involved in order to
create a
sample archive file. Bec
Hello
does anybody here know a possibility to use gpg key-groups under gnome?
groups defined in the gpg.conf
(e.g. "group mygroupname = 0x9DB0 0x9540")
do not show up in nautilus' seahorse extension.
kgpg is capable of dealing with groups, but as it is a KDE-application
it ist not usable
12 matches
Mail list logo
