James Moe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Is is possible to view the contents of a public key file without
> importing first?
PGPDUMP
http://www.pgpdump.net/
$ pgpdump JamesMoe.asc | more
Old: Public Key Packet(tag 6)(418 bytes)
Ver 4 - new
Public key creation time - Sun A
check out the "--list-packets" option.
On Apr 27, 2007, at 7:03 PM, James Moe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Is is possible to view the contents of a public key file without
importing first?
- --
jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> Is is possible to view the contents of a public key file without
> importing first?
What do you mean, "view the contents"? The file is right there for
you to look at.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iFYEAREIA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Is is possible to view the contents of a public key file without
importing first?
- --
jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (OS/2)
iD8DBQFGMqt9zTcr8Prq0ZMRApuGAJ9p+yms2Hcqh+vrE20gJYeli5nvAACgqCf
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:34:46AM -0400, Blumenthal, Uri wrote:
> Since SHA224 is part of the NIST standard, and TIGER isn't - I question
> this decision and hope that GPG-2 team will reconsider.
Everyone take a breath. There is nothing wrong, and nobody has
decided to not support SHA224. The G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Moe wrote:
> One of the features of PGP is its ability to sign and encrypt from a
> single command. Is it possible to do the same with gpg?
>
Thank you all who responded.
- --
jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
Since SHA224 is part of the NIST standard, and TIGER isn't - I question
this decision and hope that GPG-2 team will reconsider.
Thank you!
--
Regards,
Uri Blumenthal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter S. May
Sent: Friday, April 27, 200
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:21:10PM +0300, Charly Avital wrote:
> Graham Murray wrote the following on 4/27/07 1:34 PM:
> > I am no longer able to verify signatures, or even list my keyring. I
> > suspect that a key as been (automatically) imported which uses SHA224
> > which gpg does not support. C
Charly Avital wrote:
> It *would seem* that it is gpg2 (not gpg) that does not support SHA224.
Confirmed. 1.4.7 and 2.0.3 (both from source) are also on my system.
$ (gpg --version; gpg2 --version) | grep 'Hash:'
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD1
Graham Murray wrote the following on 4/27/07 1:34 PM:
> I am no longer able to verify signatures, or even list my keyring. I
> suspect that a key as been (automatically) imported which uses SHA224
> which gpg does not support. Can anyone advise what I can do to a) Fix
> the keyring and b) Stop it g
I am no longer able to verify signatures, or even list my keyring. I
suspect that a key as been (automatically) imported which uses SHA224
which gpg does not support. Can anyone advise what I can do to a) Fix
the keyring and b) Stop it getting borked in future?
gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.3
Copy
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> One of the features of PGP is its ability to sign and encrypt from a
> single command. Is it possible to do the same with gpg?
> If not, can you recommend a method that would accomplish the same thing?
gpg -se -r recipients_keyid_or_whatev
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> please enter passphrase> **
> and it works
> I would like to put the passphrase in the command so I wont be prompted for
> it. Can this be done?
Yes, the option is descriped in the man page. But before you do that
you should think abou
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How Can I Convert a Public key Like this to a Convert Public Key to Decimal
> Number? I can see it in Hex but not the actual Number itself.
For example by using bc
man bc
set ibase to 16 to read in hex numbers.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> One of the features of PGP is its ability to sign and encrypt from a
> single command. Is it possible to do the same with gpg?
gpg --armor --encrypt --sign \
--recipient [recipient1] --recipient [recipient2] \
--local-user [signi
Hi,
On 200704270027, James Moe wrote:
> I am converting a program that made system calls to PGP to handle
> security operations, to using gpg instead.
> One of the features of PGP is its ability to sign and encrypt from a
> single command. Is it possible to do the same with gpg?
> If not, ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am converting a program that made system calls to PGP to handle
security operations, to using gpg instead.
One of the features of PGP is its ability to sign and encrypt from a
single command. Is it possible to do the same with gpg?
If no
17 matches
Mail list logo