Charly Avital wrote: > It *would seem* that it is gpg2 (not gpg) that does not support SHA224.
Confirmed. 1.4.7 and 2.0.3 (both from source) are also on my system. $ (gpg --version; gpg2 --version) | grep 'Hash:' Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224 Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, TIGER192, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 In other words: 1.4.7 supports SHA224 but not TIGER192. 2.0.3 supports TIGER192 but not SHA224. I myself was curious why SHA224 was inexplicably dropped. Not that I assume many people use it, but it seems a bit arbitrary. Is there an explanation, wk? M2C PSM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
