-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Shaw wrote the following on 12/7/06 5:48 PM:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>
>>> -
>>> /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
>>> _libiconv
>> Well, you need a p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Shaw wrote the following on 12/7/06 5:48 PM:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>
>>> -
>>> /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
>>> _libiconv
>> Well, you need a p
David Shaw wrote:
> Ok. The problem is simple: you don't have zlib installed, or at
> least don't have the zlib development package installed. I'm not
> sure what it's called on Ubuntu, but there is probably some
> variation of "zlib" and some variation on "zlib-devel". You need
> zlib-devel.
I
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:01:33PM -0500, Zach Himsel wrote:
> On 12/7/06, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We need at least a tiny bit of information to try and help you. Let's
> > start with what kind of computer you have and what OS is running on
> > it? Then look in config.log and se
On 12/7/06, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need at least a tiny bit of information to try and help you. Let's
> start with what kind of computer you have and what OS is running on
> it? Then look in config.log and see what it says about zlib.h (stuff
> like "checking for zlib.h usabil
David Shaw wrote:
> OSX has iconv already.
Minor correction; OS X 10.4 has iconv already. For 10.3 and previous,
iconv is not part of the operating system.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnup
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:56:38PM -0600, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
> > OSX has iconv already.
>
> Minor correction; OS X 10.4 has iconv already. For 10.3 and previous,
> iconv is not part of the operating system.
That's not correct. 10.3 has iconv. 10.2 doesn't, but, well, 1
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:22:53PM -0500, Zach Himsel wrote:
> Yes, I know there has been a lot of compiling error going around on
> gnupg-users recently but I have tried to find the problem, but cannot.
>
> My './configure' works fine, but I get the following error part-way
> through 'make':
>
>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > -
> > /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
> > _libiconv
>
> Well, you need a proper iconv installation too. We need too do have
> an extra test for it in case NLS has been disa
Yes, I know there has been a lot of compiling error going around on
gnupg-users recently but I have tried to find the problem, but cannot.
My './configure' works fine, but I get the following error part-way
through 'make':
compress.c:36:18: error: zlib.h: No such
Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> I got a patch plus sig just fine, sure it isn't somewhere between
> the list server and you that the scrubbing happens?
I'm only talking about the archives. The patch arrived here just fine
as well. But say I want to point at it in a distribution package or
tell a frien
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:01:22PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Werner Koch wrote:
> > Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
> > signatures ;-).
>
> Thanks Werner. Seems that the list archives scrub the attachment,
> which makes it less useful than it'd be otherwi
Werner Koch wrote:
> Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
> signatures ;-).
Thanks Werner. Seems that the list archives scrub the attachment,
which makes it less useful than it'd be otherwise, 'cause you can't
point others to the signed patch. If any of the list o
Hi!
Here comes a signed pacth agains 1.4.5 for those who care to verify
signatures ;-).
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
This is a patch against GnuPG 1.4.5. Change the directory to g10/ and
apply this
Hi!
Here comes a signed patch against 2.0.1 for those who care to verify
signatures ;-).
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
This is a patch against GnuPG 2.0.1. Change the directory to g10/ and
apply this
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs
>> much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6
>> changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory "GNU Utilities"
>> just as 2.0.1 d
Hello,
I am pleased to announce a security update to the 1.2 series of
GnuPG: Version 1.2.8.
The 1.2.x series has reached end of life status about 2 years ago.
However, I make an update available for the sake of those who can't
migrate to 1.4. There is no guarantee that all problems are solved i
Andrew Berg wrote:
>> TrueCrypt works also on Linux (kernel 2.6.5 and up). The advantage is
>> that a TC volume can be accessed on both Linux and windows - very
>> usefull when I use the same USB stick both at home and on my work.
>Uhhh... TC requires admin rights in order to mount a virtual d
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> -
> /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
> _libiconv
Well, you need a proper iconv installation too. We need too do have
an extra test for it in case NLS has been disabled. NLS requires
iconv anyway but there is some otehr code in gpg which ne
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
> so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed
> the texinfo file to use the dircategory "GNU Utilities" just as 2.0.1
> does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Wi
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't know what other configuration options to try, and I don't
> understand what *any* of them do, so I'm going to bag gnupg 2.0.1 and
> wait until I can find out what is going on, or maybe wait for a
> macosx binary. I'm running 1.4.5
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> i'm trying to import my belgium eID card but it only imports the belgium Root
> CA
I have currently no time to care about it. I hope I can look at this
in the next week.
My two developer cards work just fine. You need to import the root
cer
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a
> few messages explaining why).
> If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to
> compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
I know that there are some problems. Pleas
23 matches
Mail list logo
