Hi Holger,
On 21.12.2005 12:18 Uhr, Holger Schuettel wrote:
> Hi
> I've any questions. How can i generate a keypair with size more than
> 4096 bits? I've a RSA key from my friend in my keyring with 16384 bits.
> How is that possible? I've to try it with gnupg to generate a key over
> 4096 bits a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:32:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would rank the initial setup effort as 2, 1, 3, 4.
>
To followup on myself...
All your users will have to import your root certificate to stop SW
from complaining about un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:47:56PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>
> I just got in charge of managing Linux- and Unix servers at the University of
> Salzburg (Austria) and one of my first tasks is to implement a secure way of
> exchanging email
Johan Wevers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>might be interesting to see the year 2020 gnupg version,
>>the max keylength proposed then,
>>and then link back to this thread ;-)
>
>
> Considering the direction the EU is moving, it might be very wel that
> key lengts above 64 bits RSA or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>might be interesting to see the year 2020 gnupg version,
>the max keylength proposed then,
>and then link back to this thread ;-)
Considering the direction the EU is moving, it might be very wel that
key lengts above 64 bits RSA or DH are outlawed then. :-(
--
ir. J.C.
Holger Schuettel schrieb:
> - gpg control packet
> Hi
> I've any questions. How can i generate a keypair with size more than
> 4096 bits? I've a RSA key from my friend in my keyring with 16384 bits.
> How is that possible? I've to try it with gnupg to generate a key over
> 4096 bits and thats not
Hi!
I already sent this email twice to this mailinglist, but it didn't appear at
my mailserver, so I assume it didn't reach any of you.
I just got in charge of managing Linux- and Unix servers at the University of
Salzburg (Austria) and one of my first tasks is to implement a secure way of
exc
Johan Wevers johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote on
Fri Dec 23 14:52:18 CET 2005 :
> Over 15 years, why would I care it's slow with current hardware
with
> my then low-end multicore 20 GHz CPU? :-)
might be interesting to see the year 2020 gnupg version,
the max keylength proposed then,
and then li
Atom Smasher wrote:
>even then, how hard is it to get a group of non-geeks, who didn't grow up
>with computers, to use pgp?
I'm even trying to convince my girlfriend after the latest EU data retention
laws (combined with remailers).
>i think they're more likely to use carrier pigeons than pgp.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Johan Wevers wrote:
Werner Koch wrote:
Talking about 4k keys is in this respect useless - unless you have very
special requirements and can neglect the above points. However, with
such requirements you will also have the staff and money to take proper
decisions and impl
Werner Koch wrote:
>Talking about 4k keys is in this respect useless - unless you have
>very special requirements and can neglect the above points. However,
>with such requirements you will also have the staff and money to take
>proper decisions and implement new code from scratch.
Not necessari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snp 16k key]
>after trying it for a half hour or less,
>it should be out of everyone's curiosity ;-)
Over 15 years, why would I care it's slow with current hardware with
my then low-end multicore 20 GHz CPU? :-)
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fic
12 matches
Mail list logo
