Re: Emacs interface to gpg

2005-10-18 Thread Nic Ferrier
Patrik Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just started using gpg and was looking around for an emacs mode to > encrypt/decrypt files during load and save. There are a few vague > references to crypt++, but they are all stale web sites and messages > from years ago. I finally managed to loca

RE: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16

2005-10-18 Thread Zhou, Mike
Can GnuPG import X.509 certificate/pubkey ? Thanks Mike Zhou -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 2:55 AM To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 16 Send Gnupg-use

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, Erwan David disait > Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > > > > > But you can sign the new user Id with the old one saying "yes I'm > > > the same person, only with a different address". > > > > You're talking

Re: Automation of GPG processing

2005-10-18 Thread Tracy D. Bossong
You need to set the trust model to what works for your needs in the gpg.conf file and sign and trust the recipients key. --- Stas Rirak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I need to automate an encryption process. When I > execute the command > below to process the encryption I am getting

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > > > But you can sign the new user Id with the old one saying "yes I'm > > the same person, only with a different address". > > You're talking about adding a new user ID. The original question

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:08:07AM +0200, Realos wrote: > > > I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a > > > subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 18/10/2005, David Shaw disait > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:08:07AM +0200, Realos wrote: > > I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a > > subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in combination > > my public key. > > > > Does it mean revoking a subk

Re: Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread David Shaw
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:08:07AM +0200, Realos wrote: > I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a > subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in combination > my public key. > > Does it mean revoking a subkey or uid rsults in loss of signatures I > have c

Re: PGP Zip with a single file?

2005-10-18 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:39:04PM -0500, Joe Lynch wrote: > I'm using GNUPG to decrypt files that were created as PGP Zip archives > using PGP Desktop. If there are multiple files in the archive then GNUPG > extracts a TAR file, and I have no problem processing it from there. The > problem is

PGP Zip with a single file?

2005-10-18 Thread Joe Lynch
I'm using GNUPG to decrypt files that were created as PGP Zip archives using PGP Desktop. If there are multiple files in the archive then GNUPG extracts a TAR file, and I have no problem processing it from there. The problem is when there is only one file in the PGP Zip archive it can have a f

Automation of GPG processing

2005-10-18 Thread Stas Rirak
Hello, I need to automate an encryption process. When I execute the command below to process the encryption I am getting the prompt from GPG asking if I really sure that this key belong to the recipient. gpg --output [output.gpg] --recipient [public_key_name --encrypt [file_to_encrypt.txt] Aft

gpg not running in shell script. Need Help

2005-10-18 Thread Kanakadandila, Sivaramakrishna \(GE Consumer & Industrial\)
Hi I need help in running gpg command through shell script in Informatica. This is what I tried I have a shell script which will decrypt the file. It is running fine when I ran the same script from $ prompt. The same is not running when I ran through Informatica as a command. I also initializ

Re: Emacs interface to gpg

2005-10-18 Thread Sascha Wilde
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:11:36 -0700, Patrik Jonsson said: > > > I just started using gpg and was looking around for an emacs mode to > > encrypt/decrypt files during load and save. There are a few vague > > references to crypt++, but t

Re: Emacs interface to gpg

2005-10-18 Thread Patrik Jonsson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Patrik Jonsson writes: > > > I just started using gpg and was looking around for an emacs mode to > > encrypt/decrypt files during load and save. There are a few vague > > references to crypt++, but they are all stale we

Re: Emacs interface to gpg

2005-10-18 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:11:36 -0700, Patrik Jonsson said: > I just started using gpg and was looking around for an emacs mode to > encrypt/decrypt files during load and save. There are a few vague > references to crypt++, but they are all stale web sites and messages The standard these days is pg

Re: Keyserver communications errors on Cygwin's GnuPG

2005-10-18 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:49:22 +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres said: > Is this to be reported to GnuPG developers or to Cygwin developers? That seems to be a Cygwin problem. Salam-Shalom, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org h

Keyserver communications errors on Cygwin's GnuPG

2005-10-18 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
$ gpg --send-keys DE721AF4 7 [main] gpg 1908 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: VirtualProtectEx to return to previous state in parent failed for MAP_PRIVATE address 0x93, Win32 error 87 6921 [main] gpg 1908 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: WARNING: VirtualProtect to copy protection to child fail

Re: Encrypt from memory to disc?

2005-10-18 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:55:57PM -0700, Steve Leibel wrote: > I have an application where I have data in memory that needs to be > encrypted without ever being written to disc, even temporarily. > > Using PGP I can run "pgp -feat" and then pipe the data to the pgp > process. That works very we

Re: Modifying an uid, can it be done?

2005-10-18 Thread Alphax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > I edit my own public key: > > Of course I can add new uids using the adduid command: > > [ultimate] (1) Ismael Valladolid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [ unknown] (2) Ismael Valladolid Torres (Oberthur Card Systems) > <

Subkey revocation means losing signatures?

2005-10-18 Thread Realos
I am a bit confused about the gnupg behaviour in case of revoking a subkey or uid. Since uids are actually signed by others in combination my public key. Does it mean revoking a subkey or uid rsults in loss of signatures I have collected over the time? How to proceed in such a case? -- Luqman M

Encrypt from memory to disc?

2005-10-18 Thread Steve Leibel
I have an application where I have data in memory that needs to be encrypted without ever being written to disc, even temporarily. Using PGP I can run "pgp -feat" and then pipe the data to the pgp process. That works very well. I have to do the same thing for GPG, but I can't figure out how t